Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

identified to have

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"identified to have" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You could use it to describe a situation where something or someone has been determined to possess a certain quality or characteristic. Example: The witness was identified to have seen the suspect leave the scene of the crime.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Master curves of the viscoelastic parameters were constructed and were identified to have asymmetric shapes.

The residues with significant difference were identified to have a RMSD value larger than 2 Å.

Fifteen of those were identified to have originated from GM varieties.

These variables were identified to have large effects on the growth of SiO2 particles.

All the tested variables were identified to have significant effects (p < 0.05) on fermentable sugars recovery.

A new compound 30 was identified to have improved biological activity.

Furthermore, 41 plasma proteins were identified to have some interaction with PEI.

We analyzed surgical choices in patients who were identified to have VUS.

A hendecapeptide FHRKKGRGKHK was identified to have a strong affinity to the FP (1 11).

These three compounds were also identified to have favorable pharmacokinetic properties.

Seven hips (6 patients; 4 acetabular components, 7 femoral components) were identified to have ALTR.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified to have", ensure that the identifying process or criteria are clear to maintain transparency and credibility in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "identified to have" without providing evidence or context for the identification. Vague claims without supporting details can weaken your argument.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified to have" functions as a verb phrase indicating a recognition or discovery of a particular attribute or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identified to have" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Its primary function is to denote that something has been recognized or determined to possess a particular characteristic. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, the phrase maintains a formal register. When employing "identified to have", ensure the identification process is clear and substantiated with evidence to maintain credibility. Alternatives like "determined to possess" or "found to exhibit" offer subtle variations in meaning, allowing for precise communication.

FAQs

How can I use "identified to have" in a sentence?

Use "identified to have" to indicate that something has been recognized or determined to possess a specific quality or characteristic. For example, "The compound was "identified to have" antibacterial properties".

What are some alternatives to "identified to have"?

Alternatives include "determined to possess", "found to exhibit", or "discovered to contain". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was identified to have" or "were identified to have"?

The correct form depends on whether the subject is singular or plural. Use "was identified to have" for a singular subject and "were identified to have" for a plural subject.

What is the difference between "identified to have" and "shown to have"?

"Identified to have" implies a recognition or discovery, while "shown to have" indicates that something has been demonstrated or proven through evidence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: