identified to

USAGE SUMMARY

"identified to" is a correct phrase in written English.
You would use it when you are describing a particular person or thing in relation to another. For example, "It has been identified to be the same person that committed the crime."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The parents were not identified to protect the boy's privacy.

The New York Times

All declined to be identified to avoid offending Armstrong.

The New York Times - Sports

But he agreed to be identified to help persuade others to participate.

The New York Times - Health

Nigel Pearson, the Newcastle United assistant manager, has been identified to work alongside him.

The Guardian - Sport

They didn't want to be identified, to protect their mother's privacy.

The New York Times

The major political factor identified to support this project was the soaring cost of welfare.

The Guardian - Opinion

"However, 89.2percentt of the suspects identified to us by victims were black or Hispanic.

The New York Times

The group asked not to be identified to protect the people who provided the internal documents.

The New York Times

And he said that candidates to succeed him had been identified to the Boeing board.

The New York Times

The men gave their names, but they are not being identified to protect them from retaliation.

The New York Times

What types of solutions need to be identified to eradicate racism in our lifetime?

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified to", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being identified and its relationship to something else. Clarity is crucial for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "identified to" excessively in passive constructions, as it can make writing sound indirect and less engaging. Opt for active voice where possible to enhance clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified to" functions primarily as a passive verb construction, indicating that something or someone has been recognized or established in relation to something else. This is supported by Ludwig, which provides numerous examples in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified to" serves as a passive verb construction, frequently used to denote the establishment of a connection or recognition of something in relation to something else. According to Ludwig, its application spans diverse fields, including science, news, and business. While grammatically sound, being "identified to" should be used thoughtfully to avoid overusing the passive voice. Several alternatives, such as "determined to be" or "recognized as", can offer more direct and impactful phrasing depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Determined to be

Focuses on the act of ascertaining or finding something out definitively, rather than just recognizing it.

Designated for

Emphasizes the purpose or intended use, rather than the act of identification itself.

Recognized as

Highlights the acknowledgment or awareness of something, often in a broader context.

Assigned to

Shifts focus to the allocation or tasking of something or someone.

Linked with

Suggests an association or connection, but not necessarily a formal identification.

Classified under

Specifically refers to categorization, often within a formal system.

Associated with

Implies a connection or relationship, which could be correlational rather than causal.

Labelled as

Focuses on the act of assigning a descriptive term.

Connected to

Highlights the relationship between two or more things.

Established as

Indicates something has been proven or widely accepted.

FAQs

How can I use "identified to" in a sentence?

You can use "identified to" to show a relationship or connection between elements. For example, "The gene was identified to be associated with the disease."

What are some alternatives to "identified to"?

Alternatives include "determined to be", "recognized as", or "associated with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to use "identified to"?

No, it's not always necessary. Sometimes a more direct verb, such as "found" or "discovered", can be more concise and impactful.

What's the difference between "identified to" and "associated with"?

"Identified to" implies a specific finding or connection, while "associated with" suggests a broader, possibly correlational, relationship.