identified of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified of" is not correct and usable in written English.
It seems to be a misuse of the verb "identify," which typically requires a different preposition. Example: "The suspect was identified as the person who committed the crime."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The problem he identified, of course, remains.

The New York Times

To date, 1,128 victims from the trade center attack have been positively identified, of the estimated total of 2,823, according to city officials.

The New York Times

He appears to take at face value that "no records have been identified" of ministers being briefed about intelligence delivered to loyalists.

The Guardian - Opinion

Clearly identified, of course, reproductions can stand as objects of beauty in their own right.

The New York Times

Six studies were identified, of which three were excluded.

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

In total 46 SNPs were identified, of which 13 are located in exons (Fig. 1b).

Rice

Also, about 50 macrofossils have been identified of rudist, gastropods, pelecypods, ammonites, echinodermata and coral.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

Preoperatively, 15 SNs were identified, of which 14 were identified using freehandSPECT.

EJNMMI Research

The main hydration products identified of autoclaved specimens are calcium silicate hydrates and tobermorite gel.

Construction and Building Materials

Thirteen station types were identified, of which six were associated with BRT ridership.

Journal of Transport Geography

A total of 70 SSI publications were identified, of which 41 were selected.

Applied Ergonomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "identified as" instead of "identified of". The former is grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Common error

Avoid using the preposition "of" after "identified". The correct preposition is "as". For example, instead of "The suspect was identified of the thief", write "The suspect was identified as the thief".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified of" functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI indicates that this usage is not standard English. The correct form is "identified as".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

67%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified of" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. The correct and standard alternative is ""identified as"". While "identified of" appears in a few contexts like science and news, its usage is rare and should be avoided in favor of grammatically sound alternatives to maintain clarity and credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identified as

This is the standard and grammatically correct way to express identification.

recognized as

This phrase implies a degree of prior knowledge or expectation.

classified as

This suggests a formal or systematic categorization.

determined to be

This highlights the process of investigation or analysis that led to the identification.

established as

This implies a confirmation or validation of the identification.

diagnosed with

Specifically used in medical contexts for identifying diseases or conditions.

labeled as

This suggests a tagging or marking for identification.

defined as

This emphasizes the setting of boundaries or characteristics for identification.

regarded as

This indicates a subjective or perceived identification.

known as

This implies a general awareness or common knowledge of the identification.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "identified" in a sentence?

The correct way to use "identified" is typically with the preposition "as", such as in the sentence "The suspect was "identified as" the perpetrator".

Is "identified of" grammatically correct?

No, "identified of" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is usually ""identified as"".

What can I say instead of "identified of"?

Since "identified of" is incorrect, use ""identified as"". For example, "The problem was "identified as" a software bug".

Which is correct, "identified as" or "identified of"?

"Identified as" is the correct phrase. "Identified of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided.