identified in the first

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified in the first" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been previously mentioned or specified, typically in a formal or academic context. Example: "The variables identified in the first section of the report are crucial for our analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They have been identified in the first national survey of orphans, which was conducted by the British charity Street Child.

The Guardian

One — Gabriella Barney — is believed to be the daughter of a man identified in the first group of suspects.

The New York Times

The other main division, the "treatment" section, considers a variety of "therapies" that address the problems identified in the first section.

Encyclopedia Britannica

complete reading of all 14 articles identified, in the first sub-phase, as high relation.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

The most promising adjuvant identified in the first experiment was the organosilicone-blend superspreader (Du-Wett®).

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

In fact, dural ectasia was identified in the first reported patient with a TGFBR2 mutation [11].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Based on literature reviews, aggressive and cooperative drivers were identified in the first stage.

International Journal of Project Management

A total of 110 viruses were identified in the first and 55 in the second phase.

Journal of Clinical Virology

Settlements from the three different groups identified in the first analysis were present in this restricted sample.

Pastoralism

In this way, key concepts identified in the first phase were organized in the base taxonomy of environmental phenomena.

City, Territory and Architecture

However, when the proposed fast transition is triggered, some staying tags may not be identified in the first phase.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified in the first", ensure that there is a clear subsequent step or phase to which you are contrasting it. This clarifies the sequence and importance of the initial identification.

Common error

Ensure that "identified in the first" is followed by a clear reference to what happened in subsequent stages. Without this context, the initial identification lacks significance and can confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified in the first" typically functions as a past participle phrase modifying a noun. It specifies that something was recognized or discovered during an initial stage or phase, which Ludwig AI confirms. This phrase is often used to set up a sequence of events or findings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

77%

News & Media

16%

Encyclopedias

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified in the first" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and formal writing. According to Ludwig AI, it functions to specify the initial recognition or discovery of something, often setting up a subsequent sequence of events. While there are several semantically similar alternatives, such as "initially identified" or "first discovered", it’s important to use them in the proper context to maintain clarity. When writing with this expression, remember to clearly reference the following stages or steps to provide a comprehensive understanding.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Initially identified

Focuses on the action of initial recognition or discovery.

Originally identified

Highlights the chronological aspect of the identification.

First discovered

Emphasizes the discovery aspect rather than just identification.

Initially detected

Suggests a detection process rather than an identification one.

First recognized

Emphasizes the recognition of something for the first time.

Previously identified

Highlights that the identification occurred at an earlier time.

Initially classified

Focuses on the classification aspect of the initial finding.

First pinpointed

Suggests a precise and specific identification.

Originally detected

Highlights the original instance of detection.

At first identified

Implies a sequence of identifications where this was the starting point.

FAQs

How can I use "identified in the first" in a sentence?

Use "identified in the first" to indicate that something was recognized or discovered initially, often followed by subsequent findings or developments. For example, "The key issues were "identified in the first" phase of the study, leading to further investigation in the second phase."

What can I say instead of "identified in the first"?

You can use alternatives like "initially identified", "first discovered", or "originally detected" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. For instance, you might say, "The problem was "initially identified" during the preliminary investigation."

Is it better to use "identified in the first stage" or "identified in the initial stage"?

Both "identified in the first stage" and "identified in the initial stage" are grammatically correct, but "identified in the first stage" is often preferred for its simplicity and directness. The choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

What's the difference between "identified in the first" and "identified at the beginning"?

"Identified in the first" implies a structured sequence or process with distinct stages, while "identified at the beginning" simply indicates that something was recognized early on, without necessarily implying a formal series of steps. Using ""identified in the first" phase" suggests a methodical approach, whereas "identified at the beginning" is more general.