identified from

USAGE SUMMARY

"identified from" is a perfectly valid and grammatically correct phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe the process of determining something from a certain source or context. For example, "The cause of the problem was identified from the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

International experts were identified from this survey.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Mechanisms of erosion corrosion were identified from the results.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The modes of continuum damage are identified from the analysis.

Composites Part B: Engineering

The structural modal parameters are identified from measured data.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The possible source of discrepancy is identified from the analysis.

Composite Structures

The SF and STs were manually identified from ionograms.

Advances in Space Research

The modal parameters are identified from two subspace algorithms.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Spaces of action are identified from two perspectives.

City, Territory and Architecture

In addition, lithofacies were identified from the outcrops.

Petroleum Science

Key data sources identified from the reviewed studies.

Health Economics Review

In total, 18 categories were identified from the raw data.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified from", ensure the source is credible and clearly stated to enhance the reliability of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "identified from" without specifying the source. For instance, instead of saying "Problems were identified from research", specify which research.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified from" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the origin or source of information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically correct phrase used to denote that something was determined based on a specific source.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

82%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that serves to attribute information or findings to a specific source. As Ludwig AI verifies, it's suitable for a variety of contexts, ranging from formal scientific publications to news articles. While the phrase is quite versatile, remember to specify the source to enhance clarity and credibility. Alternatives like "derived from" or "ascertained through" can be used to add nuance depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

determined by

Focuses on the agent or method that dictates the outcome or characteristics.

derived from

Focuses on the origin or source from which something originates.

ascertained through

Highlights the process or means by which something was discovered or confirmed.

deduced from

Emphasizes the logical reasoning or inference used to reach a conclusion.

extracted from

Implies that something was taken or drawn out from a larger body of information or material.

revealed by

Indicates that something was made known or visible through a particular source or event.

recognized in

Implies acknowledgement of something's presence based on evidence.

uncovered via

Highlights the discovery of something previously unknown through a specific method or tool.

established using

Emphasizes the methods used in proving or coming to a conclusion.

obtained via

Describes the means by which something was acquired or gained.

FAQs

How can I use "identified from" in a sentence?

Use "identified from" to indicate the source from which something was discovered or determined. For example, "The error was identified from the log files".

What are some alternatives to "identified from"?

You can use alternatives like "derived from", "ascertained through", or "determined by" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "identified from" or "identified by"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Identified from" specifies the source of identification, while "identified by" indicates the method or criteria used.

What's the difference between "identified from" and "recognized in"?

"Identified from" implies a more formal or systematic process of discovery, while "recognized in" suggests acknowledgement based on pre-existing knowledge or patterns.