Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

identical with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identical with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to indicate that two or more things are the same or exactly alike. For example, "Their fingerprints were identical with each other's."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are practically identical with British regulations".

News & Media

The Guardian

and are identical with those given by the Bohr theory.

All of these are practically identical with the received text.

(Nowadays, especially in film, the adultery narrative is effectively identical with crime fiction — crime, confession, consequence).

News & Media

The New Yorker

The capital city of modernism was not even topographically identical with the Paris of today.

News & Media

The Guardian

Milton and Montaigne became identical with the books they had composed.

Will Mr. Crichton or Stephen King become identical with a screen?

Why? "It's necessary to invent a politics that is not identical with power.

News & Media

The Guardian

In twenty-five of these, the pottery was identical with the jars from the original cave.

News & Media

The New Yorker

On the contrary, "divine providence is identical with the course of nature".

At the other table the auction was identical, with Diego Brenner becoming the declarer for Brazil.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Substitute "identical with" with more succinct options, such as "the same as" or "equal to", for conciseness when appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "identical with" to describe items that are only nearly the same. Reserve this phrase for situations where there is an exact match, as using it loosely can reduce the impact of its intended meaning. For example, don't say 'The shades of blue were identical with each other' if they only appear very similar. Instead, use "nearly identical" or "very similar".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identical with" functions as a linking expression, indicating that two or more entities share the exact same characteristics or qualities. Ludwig AI highlights its role in equating subjects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

32%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identical with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to denote exact equivalence between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts. While alternatives such as "the same as" or "equal to" may offer more concise phrasing, "identical with" serves to emphasize the complete lack of difference. Predominantly found in scientific, news, and encyclopedic sources, it conveys precision and accuracy. When writing, ensure you're describing a precise match rather than a near similarity. Overall, "identical with" is a reliable and effective phrase for expressing exact equivalence.

FAQs

How can I use "identical with" in a sentence?

You can use "identical with" to show that two or more things are exactly the same. For example, "The DNA samples were "identical with" each other".

What's the difference between "identical with" and "similar to"?

"Identical with" implies an exact match, while "similar to" suggests a resemblance but not complete equivalence. Use "identical with" when there is no discernible difference, and "similar to" when there are some differences but also notable resemblances.

What can I say instead of "identical with"?

You can use alternatives like "the same as", "equal to", or "equivalent to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "identical to" instead of "identical with"?

While "identical with" is correct, "identical to" is more commonly used and generally preferred in modern English. Both convey the same meaning of exact equivalence. Consider using "identical to" for greater clarity and acceptance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: