identical in size

USAGE SUMMARY

"identical in size" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to compare two or more things and note that they are all the same size. For example: "The twins were wearing identical outfits that were identical in size."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But both are nearly identical in size.

The Guardian - Money

They're nearly identical in size and subject yet illuminatingly different.

The New York Times - Arts

The apartments are all nearly identical in size at about 325 square feet.

The New York Times

They are identical in size, shape and quality, only one has a logo on the breast.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Same fish," he said of the second halibut, almost identical in size to the first.

The New York Times - Sports

Jelly beans are identical in size and shape – perfect for a blindfold taste test.

The Guardian

The three specimens were identical in size and internal reinforcement.

Composite Structures

All the keys since the mid-1970s have been identical in size and nearly identical in style.

The New York Times

Renderings of the patent show two buttons, identical in size and shape, along the outer casing of a handheld device.

Harvard University

It has two bedrooms, nearly identical in size and layout, connected by a bathroom.

The New York Times

Also, the four wings are almost identical in size and shape and in the vein patterns.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing objects, use "identical in size" to clearly indicate that they share the exact same dimensions. Be precise; avoid vague terms like "similar" if the size is truly identical.

Common error

Avoid using "identical in size" when objects are only approximately the same size. If there's any measurable difference, opt for terms like "similar in size" or "nearly identical in size".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identical in size" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to specify that multiple objects share the same dimensions. As Ludwig shows, this phrase is commonly used to provide precise descriptions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identical in size" is a grammatically correct and frequently used adjectival phrase that describes objects sharing the same dimensions. According to Ludwig, it is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, though its precision lends itself well to scientific, technical, and comparative writing. While it's mostly found in news, scientific, and academic source, it is important to remember to use alternatives such as "equal in dimension", "of the same dimensions" or "matching in size" if a more relaxed tone needs to be adopted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equal in dimension

Emphasizes dimensional equality, a direct synonym.

of the same dimensions

Rephrases the concept using "dimensions" instead of "size".

matching in size

Uses "matching" to indicate size similarity.

uniform in measurement

Focuses on the consistency of measurements.

exactly the same size

Adds emphasis to the sameness of size.

equivalent in scale

Uses "scale" to refer to relative size, suitable for maps or models.

similar in proportions

Highlights that the ratio of the measurements are alike.

comparable in area

Emphasizes similarity in two-dimensional extent rather than volume or height.

near equal size

Indicates approximate but not exact size.

roughly the same size

Uses "roughly" to indicate an approximation.

FAQs

How can I use "identical in size" in a sentence?

You can use "identical in size" to compare objects or entities, indicating that they have the same dimensions. For example, "The two paintings were "identical in size", making it difficult to distinguish them at a distance."

What are some alternatives to saying "identical in size"?

Some alternatives include "equal in dimension", "of the same dimensions", or "matching in size". The choice depends on the specific context and the desired level of formality.

When is it appropriate to use "nearly identical in size" instead of "identical in size"?

Use "nearly "equal size"" or "roughly the same size" when the objects are very close in size but not exactly the same. "Identical" implies perfect sameness, while "nearly identical" acknowledges a slight difference.

Is "identical in size" formal or informal language?

"Identical in size" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. It's a straightforward and clear way to express that two or more things have the same dimensions. More informal alternatives might be phrases like "about the roughly the same size".