human blood

USAGE SUMMARY

"human blood" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing medical topics, discussing topics such as violence or horror, or talking about life in general. For example, "The sight of the human blood made her feel faint."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Human blood.

The New Yorker

It's tasted human blood".

The New York Times

Human blood; animal blood prepd.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

But he would entertain human blood.

The Guardian

Vampires neck human blood to survive.

The Guardian

Luckily for mankind, only a few relish human blood.

The New York Times

"Politicians forbade profit from human blood," said Dr. Girard.

The New York Times

Later work established longer storage times for human blood.

The Guardian

There are traces in the environment and in human blood.

The Guardian

They eat green salad and drink human blood".

The New Yorker

HIV requires the CCR5 gene to enter human blood cells.

MIT Technology Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about medical or scientific topics, use "human blood" to maintain clarity and precision. Avoid overly figurative language unless the context is literary.

Common error

Avoid using "human blood" when referring specifically to blood components like plasma or serum. Be precise in your terminology to avoid misrepresenting the scientific or medical information.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "human blood" is as a noun phrase. It acts as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is used to refer to the blood of humans in various contexts, ranging from medical to literary.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

31%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "human blood" is a grammatically correct noun phrase, commonly used across various contexts including news, science, and academia. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. It serves the purpose of referring to blood originating from human beings, and its register varies from neutral to formal, depending on the source. While alternatives like "blood of a human" or "human serum" exist, "human blood" is frequently employed for its clarity and directness. When using the phrase, be mindful of the context to ensure accuracy and avoid overgeneralization, particularly in scientific or medical writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blood of a human

A more descriptive way to express the same concept, emphasizing the biological aspect.

homo sapiens blood

Uses the scientific classification to denote human blood.

human serum

Refers specifically to the fluid and solute component of blood, excluding blood cells and clotting factors.

human blood plasma

Specifies the protein-rich liquid component of blood, distinct from whole blood.

human blood cells

Focuses on the cellular components within blood, rather than the entire fluid.

whole blood from a human

Specifies that the blood includes all its components, without separation.

blood sample from a human

Highlights the act of obtaining blood for testing or analysis.

human circulatory fluid

A more technical and descriptive alternative for "human blood".

human blood supply

Refers to the availability of blood for medical purposes, such as transfusions.

blood drawn from a human

Emphasizes the process of extracting blood.

FAQs

How to use "human blood" in a sentence?

You can use "human blood" to refer to the blood that circulates in the human body in many contexts, such as medical research or crime reports. For example: "The researchers analyzed the "human blood" samples to identify potential biomarkers."

What can I say instead of "human blood"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "blood of a human", "human serum", or "human blood plasma" to be more specific.

Which is correct, "human blood" or "humans' blood"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "human blood" is generally preferred in formal and scientific contexts. "Humans' blood" implies possession and is better suited for informal contexts when emphasizing ownership or origin.

What's the difference between "human blood" and "animal blood"?

"Human blood" refers specifically to the blood found in humans, while "animal blood" refers to the blood of non-human animals. They differ in their biological composition and are used in different contexts, such as medical research or veterinary medicine.