holders of knowledge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "holders of knowledge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals or groups who possess knowledge or expertise in a particular area. Example: "In our society, holders of knowledge play a crucial role in educating future generations and advancing research."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

To me, libraries and librarians are both the classical holders of knowledge, and the future of how we will interact with information and learning.

Columbia University

This paper contributes to such reasoning by emphasizing the real complexities at work when traditional and modern holders of knowledge meet.

Pastoralism

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Start with Arian Foster's first name, an abbreviated version of Aquarians, chosen by his father and meaning "holder of knowledge".

The New York Times - Sports

This study by Tiepolo is in line with his choice of noble figures, in this case the holder of knowledge and experience as he might appear on life's stage in some elaborate production with a huge cast.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

As indicated in the quotes, professional training and the expectation by the professionals that they were or should be the holder of knowledge were perceived to be central to therapy.

Disability and Rehabilitation

Holders of expert knowledge are supposed to be reliable in the exercise of that knowledge; they are professionals, and part of their professionalism is to ply their trade competently regardless of the weight of passion or the blandishments of pleasure.

SEP

Besides, the researchers engaged in this second sequence were perceived as conservation stakeholders rather than holders of scientific knowledge.

Environmental Modelling & Software

Bioprospecting research designed to identify novel metabolites must be rooted in the principle of equity in sharing benefits with the holders of traditional knowledge.

Environmental Pollution

The focus was on older generations, as the holders of traditional knowledge, with almost all of the participants being over 50, and the majority being over 60 years of age.

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

Music spread from dealer to dealer by way of tapes—or it didn't, in the case of collectors who considered themselves to be the most exalted gatekeepers and holders of occult knowledge and therefore had less fun and communicated with fewer people.

Vice

This economic role of research collaboration is made possible due to the inherent capacity of collaboration to act as a vehicle for the exchange of tacit knowledge which, although is fundamental to innovation, cannot be openly traded on the market without the holder of the knowledge being part of the knowledge exchange process (Johnson et al. 2002; Karnani 2013).

Triple Helix

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "holders of knowledge", consider the specific context. It can refer to individuals, groups, or institutions, so ensure the term accurately reflects the subject you are describing.

Common error

Avoid using "holders of knowledge" in very informal settings. Simpler terms like "experts" or "knowledgeable people" may be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "holders of knowledge" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as a subject complement or appositive. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is correct and usable in written English. It identifies individuals or groups possessing significant information or expertise.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "holders of knowledge" is a grammatically correct and widely used term to describe individuals or groups possessing significant expertise. As Ludwig AI confirms, this term is suitable for various contexts, particularly in science, news media, and academia. While alternatives like "experts" or "knowledgeable individuals" may be more appropriate in informal settings, "holders of knowledge" serves as a more formal and precise way to identify those who possess and potentially disseminate knowledge, contributing to its frequent use in professional and academic discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

knowledge possessors

Replaces "holders" with "possessors", focusing on the act of possessing knowledge.

bearers of knowledge

Substitutes "holders" with "bearers", emphasizing the act of carrying or conveying knowledge.

repositories of knowledge

Replaces "holders" with "repositories", highlighting the role of storing knowledge.

custodians of knowledge

Substitutes "holders" with "custodians", emphasizing the act of protecting and preserving knowledge.

sources of knowledge

Shifts the focus to where the knowledge originates rather than who possesses it.

experts in a field

Replaces the whole phrase with a more specific term, focusing on expertise.

knowledgeable individuals

Emphasizes the quality of being knowledgeable rather than the act of holding knowledge.

authorities on a subject

Highlights the authoritative aspect of possessing knowledge.

practitioners of knowledge

Focuses on applying knowledge in a practical sense.

gatekeepers of knowledge

Emphasizes the controlling or regulating access to knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "holders of knowledge" in a sentence?

You can use "holders of knowledge" to refer to those who possess significant expertise or information in a particular area. For example, "Libraries are seen as traditional "holders of knowledge" and learning resources."

What are some alternatives to "holders of knowledge"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases such as "experts", "knowledgeable individuals", or "authorities".

Is "holders of knowledge" a formal or informal term?

"Holders of knowledge" is generally considered a neutral to formal term, suitable for academic, professional, and journalistic contexts. Simpler terms might be preferred in informal settings.

What is the difference between "holders of knowledge" and "sources of knowledge"?

"Holders of knowledge" refers to individuals or entities that possess knowledge, while "sources of knowledge" refers to where knowledge originates. A person can be a holder, whereas a book or database is a source.