Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
hoaxer
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "hoaxer" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to someone who perpetrates a hoax or deception, often in contexts involving pranks, scams, or misinformation. Example: "The internet was buzzing with rumors, but it turned out that the so-called expert was just a hoaxer trying to gain attention."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"We might get our hoaxer or hoaxers that way".
News & Media
Holland's inquiry was hampered by the hoaxer Wearside Jack, and the ongoing investigation is starting to receive its fair share of crank callers.
News & Media
If a hoaxer sends the dustmen to the wrong address, little damage is done.
News & Media
But when the Reverend employs his usual box of tricks – smoking crucifixes, a special demon mix tape – he finds that, this time, he is the only hoaxer in the room.
News & Media
When he rang her she assumed he was a hoaxer, responding: "If you're the Chief Constable, I'm Brigitte Bardot".
News & Media
The 74-year-old received a barrage of criticism following his latest comment on the boy - and proceeded to defend his earlier comments by saying: "How could you think I was likening a hoaxer to a killer?
News & Media
She and police thought it was a hoaxer getting a kick out of taunting a distraught mother.
News & Media
"While there is no reason to suppose that the defendant had put the hoaxer up to making these calls, the calls can only have added to the state of confusion as to Gemma's whereabouts".
News & Media
Perhaps it will be shown that Ed Balls the Education Minister who recently was revealed "Twittering" on the internet and describing how he had made himself a Chinese meal has also been the victim of a hoaxer.
News & Media
Even Wired recognised that they might be wrong about the identification: "two possibilities outweigh all others: Either Wright invented bitcoin, or he's a brilliant hoaxer who very badly wants us to believe he did".
News & Media
Remember poor James Bulger?" How COULD you think I was likening a hoaxer to a killer?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a "hoaxer", consider the specific type of deception involved. For instance, is it a playful prank, a deliberate fraud, or a sophisticated scheme?
Common error
While "hoaxer" is widely understood, it can sound informal in certain contexts. In professional or academic writing, consider using more formal alternatives like "fraudulent individual" or "deceptive person" to maintain a serious tone.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The word "hoaxer" functions as a noun, specifically identifying a person who creates or perpetrates a hoax. It's straightforward and commonly understood, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples of its use in news and media.
Frequent in
News & Media
95%
Science
2%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The term "hoaxer" is a noun used to describe someone who perpetrates a hoax. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in news and media contexts. While generally neutral in tone, its use implies a negative connotation due to the deceptive nature of hoaxes. When using the term, consider the specific type of deception involved and the context in which you are writing. In more formal settings, consider using synonyms such as "fraudulent individual" or "deceptive person" to maintain a serious tone. Remember that the term is accusatory and requires proper use and context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
perpetrator of a hoax
This alternative more explicitly describes the action of carrying out a hoax.
fraudulent individual
This alternative focuses on the deceitful nature of the person.
deceptive person
This alternative emphasizes the act of misleading others.
deceiver
This alternative is a general term for someone who deceives.
imposter
This alternative suggests someone pretending to be someone they are not.
trickster
This alternative implies a playful or mischievous form of deception.
sham
This refers to someone who is not genuine or what they claim to be.
charlatan
This refers to someone falsely claiming to have special skills or knowledge.
confidence trickster
This alternative specifically refers to someone who gains trust to deceive.
scammer
This alternative refers to someone who engages in fraudulent schemes.
FAQs
How can I use "hoaxer" in a sentence?
You can use "hoaxer" to describe someone who creates and spreads hoaxes. For example, "The police were searching for the "hoaxer" who made the false bomb threat".
What's the difference between a "hoaxer" and a "prankster"?
A "prankster" plays harmless jokes, while a "hoaxer" creates a deception intended to mislead or cause harm. The key difference lies in the intent and potential consequences.
Are there any synonyms for "hoaxer"?
Is it appropriate to call someone a "hoaxer"?
Calling someone a "hoaxer" is accusatory and should only be done if you have strong evidence they intentionally created and spread a deception. It's essential to be certain of your facts before using this term.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested