history of communications

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "history of communications" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the development and evolution of communication methods and technologies over time. Example: "The history of communications reveals how far humanity has come in connecting with one another, from smoke signals to the internet."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

There was never anything like it in the history of communications.

The New York Times

"Television has had the greatest potential for educating and informing of any medium in the history of communications," he said.

Independent

It attests that in the past, the world looked very different from the way it appears now.The history of communications is yet another of the book's offerings.

The Economist

And one thing we've learned from the history of communications technology is that people tend to overestimate the short-term impact of new technologies — and to underestimate their long-term implications.

The Guardian - Tech

In one sense, The Influence Machine dealt with the history of communications, and in another with our longing to conquer both time and death: the wish to find proof of an afterlife.

The Guardian - Arts

In the lobby, 15 linen-backed ceiling murals -- a flapper-era celebration of the history of communications also declared a landmark -- were damaged by burst water mains and firefighting efforts.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Oursler's disembodied talking heads, projections on to the surrounding buildings, trees and billowing clouds of dry ice, tapped into the rackety histories of communications with the dead, of optics and alchemy - the blurring between science, technological research, spiritualist fervour and fakery.

The Guardian - Arts

Well, he was a college professor — first of American history, then of communications — for his entire professional life, mostly at Rutgers.

The New Yorker

Still, if the history of virtual communications is any guide, the more business people communicate with high-technology tools, the more likely they are also to want to have a cup of coffee together or make small talk during a pause in a face-to-face conference.

The New York Times

AT&T is the star of Wu's book, an intellectually ambitious history of modern communications.

The New York Times - Books

That unprecedented accomplishment marks one of the greatest achievements in the history of written communications.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about the "history of communications", consider focusing on specific periods or technologies to provide a more detailed analysis. For example, you might explore the history of wireless communication or the impact of the printing press.

Common error

Avoid making sweeping generalizations about the "history of communications". Ensure your claims are supported by evidence and acknowledge the complexity and diversity of communication practices across different cultures and time periods.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "history of communications" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as a subject or object in a sentence. It introduces a topic related to the development and evolution of communication methods and technologies. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Encyclopedias

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "history of communications" is a grammatically correct and useful term for discussing the evolution of communication methods, as supported by Ludwig AI. While not overly frequent, it appears in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian. It is most commonly found in news and media, encyclopedia articles and scientific publications. When using the phrase, consider specifying the period or technology to provide more detail and avoid overgeneralizations. Alternative phrases such as "evolution of communication" or "communication history" can be used depending on the context and desired level of formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

communication history

A more concise and direct way to refer to the same topic.

evolution of communication

Focuses more on the developmental process rather than a static historical account.

development of communication methods

Highlights the progression and improvement in how communication is achieved.

historical trends in communication

Emphasizes patterns and shifts observed over time in communication practices.

chronology of communication technologies

Specific to the timeline of technological advancements in communication.

rise of communication systems

Focuses on the emergence and increasing prevalence of various communication systems.

past of communication

A more concise and general reference to communication's historical aspect.

origins of communication

Emphasizes the starting points and initial forms of communication.

legacy of communication

Focuses on the lasting impact and influence of past communication methods.

story of communication

Presents the history as a narrative, often highlighting key events and figures.

FAQs

How can I use "history of communications" in a sentence?

You can use "history of communications" to introduce a discussion about how communication methods have evolved, such as, "The "history of communications" reveals how technological advancements have shaped human interaction".

What is another way to say "history of communications"?

Alternatives include "evolution of communication", "development of communication methods", or "communication history", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "history of communications" and "communication history"?

While both phrases refer to the same subject, "history of communications" is slightly more formal and expansive, while "communication history" is a more concise and direct way to refer to the topic. The choice depends on the context and desired level of formality.

Why is understanding the "history of communications" important?

Studying the "history of communications" provides insights into how societies have evolved, how information has been disseminated, and how different cultures have interacted. It also helps us understand the impact of current communication technologies and anticipate future trends.