historical remove

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "historical remove" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a distance or detachment from historical events or contexts, often in discussions of history or analysis. Example: "The historian approached the subject with a sense of historical remove, allowing for a more objective analysis of the events."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Even in fiction, Padura alludes to Fidel only at a historical remove.

The New Yorker

Although the play, which pivots on accusations of child molestation, was first staged in 2004 — two years after the Roman Catholic Church sex-abuse scandals erupted in America — it unfolds at a historical remove in 1964.

The New York Times

And to view their work, even at a historical remove, isn't so different from reading the newspaper and learning about the crises and upheavals taking place around us today.

The New York Times - Arts

Exceptions do exist, which record more or less remote events at a conscious historical remove; archival specimens, for example, and secondhand copies generally lack the contemporaneity of other inscriptions.

Encyclopedia Britannica

What makes Brock's tale effective is his insider's portrait of a political slime operation, much of it comic from even this slight historical remove, about which the facts already exist for the most part on the public record -- and sometimes on the legal record as well.

The New York Times - Magazine

The bulk of the photos were taken in the United States between the mid-nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries, none after the seventies, and all are in black and white, as if to emphasize their historical remove from our own filtered times.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Gov. Jeb Bush had it and three other historical flags removed and placed in a museum, a move Mr. Hurst's group protested.

The New York Times

The marketplace is not dominated by human vanity, though, and many retouching outfits specialize in solving other problems, like fixing poorly preserved historical photographs, removing dust marks or simply balancing the colors.

The New York Times - Tech

Medrano said he believed a violent far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August and ensuing national controversy had helped focus attention on the symbolism of oppression and energized efforts to have statues of controversial historical figures removed from public spaces.

The Guardian

Death at a historical or emotional remove may provide safe entertainment, but death in actual fact still scares us.

The New York Times - Arts

Amanda Finn, the museum's executive director, began rushing to remove historical artifacts, including a walking stick that President Andrew Jackson had given Carson.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "historical remove" when you want to emphasize a detached perspective on past events, suggesting objectivity or a lack of immediate emotional connection. This phrase is particularly useful in academic or analytical writing.

Common error

Avoid using "historical remove" when you mean physically removing or altering historical artifacts or records. Ensure your writing clearly indicates whether you're discussing a conceptual distance or a physical action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "historical remove" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to a conceptual or temporal distance from historical events. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English. Examples show its usage in academic and analytical contexts, describing a detached perspective.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

14%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "historical remove" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that refers to a temporal or contextual distance from historical events. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and examples illustrate its use in analytical and academic writing. While not as common as alternatives like "historical distance", "historical remove" offers a nuanced way to describe a detached perspective. The phrase is primarily employed in news, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts, emphasizing objectivity in historical analysis. When using the term, writers should ensure clarity and avoid confusing it with actions involving the physical removal of historical artifacts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

historical distance

Replaces 'remove' with 'distance', focusing on the separation in time or context.

temporal distance

Emphasizes the time-related aspect of the separation from historical events.

chronological distance

Highlights the sequential and time-based aspect of the separation.

historical perspective

Focuses on viewing events from a detached, historical viewpoint.

temporal perspective

Similar to 'historical perspective' but emphasizes the time aspect.

distance in time

A more literal expression of the separation in time.

removed in time

Highlights the state of being separated by time.

historical detachment

Focuses on the lack of emotional or personal involvement due to the passage of time.

chronological detachment

Same as historical detachment but focusing on chronological aspect.

at a remove from history

Rephrases the concept to emphasize the separation from history itself.

FAQs

How can I use "historical remove" in a sentence?

You can use "historical remove" to describe a detached perspective on past events. For example: "The historian approached the subject with a sense of "historical remove", allowing for a more objective analysis".

What does "historical remove" mean?

"Historical remove" refers to a distance or detachment from historical events or contexts. It often implies a more objective or analytical viewpoint due to the passage of time or a lack of personal connection.

Which is a better phrase, "historical remove" or "historical distance"?

Both ""historical remove"" and "historical distance" are valid, but "historical distance" is more commonly used and might be more readily understood. The choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What are some contexts where I might use the term "historical remove"?

You can use "historical remove" in academic papers, historical analyses, or discussions about how time affects our understanding of past events. It's suitable when discussing objectivity, detachment, or the evolution of perspectives over time.