high quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "high quality" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that meets a high standard or is of superior excellence. Example: "The high quality of the materials used in this product ensures its durability and longevity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

39 human-written examples

High quality?

Harvard Business Review

It's high quality, it's HD.

The New York Times

They were high quality".

The New York Times

"It's really high quality.

The New York Times

Young people want high quality.

BBC

Open Processes Encourage High Quality.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

21 human-written examples

High-quality skyscrapers".

The New Yorker

High-quality indeed.

The New York Times

Serious, high-quality projects.

The New Yorker

Abrams did high-quality reproductions.

The New York Times

This was high-quality tennis.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a specific attribute, consider pairing "high quality" with a noun to enhance clarity. For example, "high quality ingredients" or "high quality craftsmanship".

Common error

Avoid using "high quality" as a standalone descriptor without providing specific details about what makes the subject high quality. Substantiate the claim with evidence or specific features.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "high quality" primarily functions as a pre-modifying adjective phrase. It describes a noun by attributing to it the characteristic of possessing superior attributes or meeting elevated standards. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly employed.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Wiki

32%

News & Media

28%

Science

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "high quality" is a versatile adjective phrase used to denote superior standards or excellence. As Ludwig AI confirms the phrase as correct and usable in written English, it's frequently found in Wiki, News & Media and Science contexts, making it quite common. While grammatically sound, it's best practice to avoid overuse and provide specific details to support the claim of "high quality". Alternatives include "superior quality", "excellent quality", and "premium quality". Remember to specify what aspect is of high quality for maximum impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

superior quality

Emphasizes a higher grade or standard of quality.

excellent quality

Highlights the exceptional nature of the quality.

premium quality

Suggests a top-tier or luxury level of quality.

first-rate quality

Indicates the quality is of the highest standard.

top-notch quality

Similar to first-rate, implying excellent quality.

fine quality

Suggests quality characterized by delicacy or refinement.

exceptional quality

Highlights that the quality is beyond the norm.

high-grade quality

Emphasizes a superior level in terms of grade or classification.

superb quality

Indicates the quality is outstanding and impressive.

remarkable quality

Highlights that the quality is notably unusual or excellent.

FAQs

How can I use "high quality" in a sentence?

You can use "high quality" to describe anything that meets a superior standard. For instance, "This product is made with "high quality materials"" or "The company provides "high quality services"".

What can I say instead of "high quality"?

You can use alternatives like "superior quality", "excellent quality", or "premium quality" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to say "high quality quality"?

Yes, saying "high quality quality" is redundant. Just use "high quality" or specify what makes it high quality.

What's the difference between "high quality" and "good quality"?

"High quality" implies a superior level of excellence, while "good quality" suggests that something meets the basic requirements or expectations without necessarily being exceptional.