he was ousted

USAGE SUMMARY

'he was ousted' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about a person being forced out of a position, such as a job or political office. For example: "The dictator was ousted by his people in a revolution."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was ousted a month later for corruption.

The New York Times

Instead he was ousted from the family.

The Guardian

He was ousted in January 1974.

The New York Times

He was ousted as chairman and CEO in 1983.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was ousted in a military coup in February.

The New York Times

For Mubarak, it's enough that he was ousted".

The New York Times

Amid accusations of corruption, he was ousted in 1991.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was ousted in a coup in 2006.

The Economist

A year later, he was ousted from the business.

The New York Times - Books

He was ousted in 2012 following opposition protests.

The Guardian

Less than six months later he was ousted from office and now languishes in custody.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he was ousted" to clearly and concisely convey that someone was removed from a position, whether through formal procedures, force, or other means. It's suitable for various contexts, from political upheavals to corporate shake-ups.

Common error

Avoid using "he was ousted by himself" or similar constructions. The phrase already implies an external force causing the removal, so adding "by himself" is contradictory and grammatically incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was ousted" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject (he) underwent the action of being forced out. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for describing someone's removal from a position.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Encyclopedias

19%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "he was ousted" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase to describe someone's removal from a position, as supported by Ludwig's analysis. It functions as a passive construction, primarily used to report on events across news, encyclopedias and other areas, with its neutrality suitable for diverse contexts. Numerous examples in Ludwig demonstrate its consistent usage across authoritative sources, confirming its reliability in both formal and informal communication. Remember to avoid redundant phrases that can undermine the clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was removed from power

Focuses specifically on being removed from a position of authority or control.

he was overthrown

Implies a forceful and often sudden removal from a position, typically in a political context.

he was deposed

Suggests a formal or legal removal from a high-ranking position, often royalty or a head of state.

he was forced out

Emphasizes that the removal was not voluntary and likely involved pressure or coercion.

he was dismissed

Indicates a formal termination, typically from a job or official position.

he was expelled

Implies a removal from a group, organization, or institution.

he was unseated

Suggests being removed from a seated position of authority or power.

he was dethroned

Specifically refers to the removal of a monarch from their throne.

he was impeached

Indicates a formal accusation of wrongdoing that leads to removal from office, usually in a political context.

he was given the boot

An informal way of saying someone was dismissed or kicked out.

FAQs

How to use "he was ousted" in a sentence?

Use "he was ousted" to describe someone's removal from a position of power or influence. For example, "The CEO "he was ousted" after a series of financial scandals."

What can I say instead of "he was ousted"?

You can use alternatives like "he was removed from power", "he was forced out", or "he was deposed depending on the context".

Which is correct, "he was ousted" or "he ousted"?

"He was ousted" indicates that someone else removed him from power (passive voice). "He ousted" means he removed someone else (active voice). The correct choice depends on who is performing the action.

What's the difference between "he was ousted" and "he resigned"?

"He was ousted" implies an involuntary removal, while "he resigned" suggests a voluntary departure. Ousting suggests external pressure, whereas resignation implies a personal choice.