he was diagnosed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was diagnosed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe someone receiving a diagnosis from a healthcare provider, usually regarding a health condition. For example: "After several tests, he was diagnosed with diabetes and put on a treatment plan."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was diagnosed with asthenoteratozoospermia.

EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing

He was diagnosed as autistic.

Independent

He was diagnosed with depression.

The Guardian

He was diagnosed with PTSD.

The Guardian

He was diagnosed with epilepsy.

The Guardian

But he was diagnosed with leukemia.

The New York Times - Science

He was diagnosed with a rare lymphoma.

The Economist

Later, he was diagnosed with a concussion.

The New Yorker

He was diagnosed with diabetes in 1994.

Forbes

Eventually, he was diagnosed as having cancer.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

He was diagnosed with cancer in 2014.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "he was diagnosed", ensure that the context clearly indicates the condition or ailment that was diagnosed. Providing additional details about the diagnostic process can enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "he were diagnosed", as this violates subject-verb agreement. Always use "he was diagnosed" for singular subjects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was diagnosed" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received a medical diagnosis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is commonly and correctly used in English to report a diagnosis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

43%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Academia

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "he was diagnosed" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that someone has received a medical diagnosis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used across various contexts, including news, science, and formal communications. The phrase serves the purpose of informing others about a person's medical condition, and its usage remains consistent across authoritative sources. When using the phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the condition being diagnosed. Consider alternatives like "he received a diagnosis of" or "doctors diagnosed him with" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he received a diagnosis of

Replaces the passive voice with an active construction, emphasizing the act of receiving the diagnosis.

doctors diagnosed him with

Specifies the actors performing the diagnosis, adding a level of detail.

he was found to have

Focuses on the state of having a condition, rather than the diagnostic process itself.

his diagnosis was

Shifts the focus to the diagnosis itself, rather than the person receiving it.

it was determined that he had

Emphasizes the process of determination and the subsequent finding of a condition.

he presented with symptoms of and was diagnosed with

Expands to include the presentation of symptoms leading to the diagnosis, providing more context.

after examination, he was diagnosed as having

Highlights the examination process as a precursor to the diagnosis.

the tests revealed he had

Focuses on the test results as the basis for the diagnosis.

medical professionals identified him as suffering from

Uses more formal language to describe the identification of a condition.

he learned that he had

Highlights the moment of learning about the diagnosis.

FAQs

How can I use "he was diagnosed" in a sentence?

You can use "he was diagnosed" to indicate that someone received a medical diagnosis. For example, "After experiencing persistent cough, "he was diagnosed" with bronchitis".

What can I say instead of "he was diagnosed"?

Alternatives include "he received a diagnosis", "he was found to have", or "doctors diagnosed him", depending on the desired emphasis.

Which is correct, "he was diagnosed with" or "he was diagnosed of"?

"He was diagnosed with" is the correct phrasing. The preposition "with" is used to connect the diagnosis to the condition. "He was diagnosed of" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "he was diagnosed with" and "he was treated for"?

"He was diagnosed with" indicates the identification of a condition, while "he was treated for" indicates that medical care was provided for that condition. Diagnosis precedes treatment.