Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

he was condemned

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was condemned" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is judged or declared guilty, often in a legal or moral sense. Example: "After a lengthy trial, he was condemned for his crimes and sentenced to life in prison."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was condemned.

News & Media

The New York Times

The court said the officer had an opportunity to be heard before he was condemned.

He was condemned and that has not gone away.

Like him, He was condemned and put to death.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Refusing to appear in Rome under command of Pope Paul IV, he was condemned in 1558.

This time he was condemned to be pendu et etranglé ("hanged and strangled").

Pressure was huge on him because he knew he was condemned to years in prison".

News & Media

Independent

In June 1945 he was condemned to death, in absentia, for treason.

In March 1530 he was condemned as a rebel at Florence.

For this observation, he was condemned as a rightist and a racist.

He was condemned by the group for his painting The Enigma of Hitler.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he was condemned" when you want to emphasize a formal judgment or strong disapproval from an authoritative entity. Be specific about the entity doing the condemning for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "he was condemned" in casual conversation or informal writing where simpler phrases like "he was criticized" or "he was blamed" would be more appropriate. Using formal language in an informal setting can sound unnatural or pretentious.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "he was condemned" is to act as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of condemnation. Ludwig examples show this phrase being used to describe legal judgments, moral disapproval, and historical events.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

31%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Science

4%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "he was condemned" is a common passive construction used to express that someone has received a judgment or strong disapproval, as supported by Ludwig AI. It appears frequently in news, encyclopedias, and academic contexts, indicating a neutral to formal register. It is grammatically correct and effectively communicates a negative consequence or formal censure from an authority. Remember to use this phrase when precision and formality are needed, and consider simpler alternatives for informal settings. It's important to be aware of who did the condemning for clarity.

FAQs

How can I use "he was condemned" in a sentence?

You can use "he was condemned" to indicate a strong disapproval or judgment. For example, "He was condemned by the public for his actions".

What are some alternatives to "he was condemned"?

Alternatives include phrases like "he was found guilty", "he was criticized", or "he was denounced", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "he is condemned"?

While grammatically possible, "he is condemned" is less common than "he was condemned", which refers to a past judgment or condemnation. "He is condemned" implies a current state of being condemned, which is less frequently used.

What's the difference between "he was condemned" and "he was accused"?

"He was accused" means someone has made a formal charge against him, while "he was condemned" means he has been judged and found guilty or deserving of strong disapproval. Accusation precedes condemnation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: