he concurred

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he concurred" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating agreement with someone else's opinion or statement. Example: "After reviewing the proposal, he concurred with the recommendations made by the committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Exactly," he concurred.

The New Yorker

"Much more," he concurred.

The New York Times - Magazine

He concurred heartily.

The New York Times

"It's flow," he concurred.

The New Yorker

But he concurred that prices remained flat.

The New York Times

Mr. Williams said he concurred with Mr. O'Reilly.

The New York Times

Mr. Merwin said that he concurred with Mr. Ulmer's statement.

The New York Times

He concurred, though, with Ms. Aziz's central point.

The New York Times

He concurred with this attorney's analysis of Nelson's divorce case.

The New Yorker

He concurred that a sketch-by-number computerized approach was misguided.

The New York Times

He concurred and never told the audit committee about the payment, the S.E.C. found.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Follow "he concurred" with a concise restatement of the point of agreement for clarity, especially in complex discussions.

Common error

Avoid using "he concurred" in casual conversations or informal writing; simpler alternatives like "he agreed" are usually more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he concurred" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating agreement or endorsement. It is typically used when a male subject expresses agreement with a statement, opinion, or decision previously made or presented. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

84%

Encyclopedias

8%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Science

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "he concurred" is a phrase used to express agreement or endorsement, typically by a male subject, with a previously presented statement or decision. Ludwig AI confirms that is considered grammatically correct. It is most commonly found in news and media sources, with a neutral to formal register. While it is a valid phrase, simpler alternatives like "he agreed" may be more appropriate in informal settings. This phrase often suggests thoughtful consideration on the part of the person agreeing, adding a layer of formality to the communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he agreed

Simple synonym replacing "concurred" with a more common verb.

he was in agreement

Rephrases the agreement using a noun phrase instead of a verb.

he assented

Uses a more formal synonym for "agreed".

he affirmed

Indicates agreement and confirmation of something.

he endorsed

Suggests support or approval, often publicly.

he backed

Implies support, often in a more active or practical way.

he confirmed

Verifies the truth or correctness of something.

he upheld

Supports or defends a decision or principle.

he acquiesced

Agrees reluctantly or without protest.

he gave his blessing

Offers approval or permission, often with an implication of authority.

FAQs

How to use "he concurred" in a sentence?

Use "he concurred" to indicate agreement with a previously stated opinion or decision. For example: "The expert presented his findings, and "he concurred" with the proposed solution."

What can I say instead of "he concurred"?

You can use alternatives like "he agreed", "he assented", or "he was in agreement" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "he concurred" or "he concurred to"?

"He concurred" is the correct and more common usage. "He concurred to" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "he agreed" and "he concurred"?

"He agreed" is a simpler, more common way to express agreement. "He concurred" is more formal and often implies a deeper level of consideration or expertise.