having reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "having reviewed" is correct in written English and can be used in a variety of ways, usually when you have evaluated something.
For example: "Having reviewed the evidence, the judge found the defendant guilty."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

As late as 2012 the Met, having reviewed the corruption claim, said it was without foundation.

The Guardian - Opinion

Having reviewed all the information available, we concluded that we were not materially misled.

The Guardian

Having reviewed the arguments pro and con screening, I plan to continue to get annual mammograms.

The New York Times - Health

Having reviewed the whole situation, the club has agreed that Monty be released from his contract.

The Guardian - Sport

"Often the problems that transfer students face have to do with not having reviewed their options".

The New York Times

"Having reviewed some of the evidence we have decided to expand the investigation.

Independent

A spokesman for the state attorney general's office declined to comment without having reviewed the details of the transaction.

The New York Times

The commission said that "having reviewed all the evidence", it would not refer the late reporting to police.

The Guardian

Without having reviewed the legal documents, Granik said, "The idea of a coach suing a player over his public comments seems unprecedented and highly inappropriate".

The New York Times - Sports

Having reviewed the circumstances of the incident, it has been agreed that the matter will be dealt with by the FA rather than considering any criminal proceedings.

The Guardian - Sport

"Having reviewed all of the relevant material urgently" Crennan found "more is at risk for the respondents if the interim injunction is granted than for the applicant".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "having reviewed" to clearly indicate that an evaluation or assessment has been completed before stating a conclusion or subsequent action. This helps establish a logical flow in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "having reviewed" when the review is ongoing or future. Use a future tense construction instead, such as "after reviewing" or "once we review."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "having reviewed" functions as a participial phrase, modifying the subject of the main clause. It indicates a completed action of reviewing or assessing something before the action described in the main clause takes place. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

19%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "having reviewed" is a versatile participial phrase used to introduce a clause by specifying that a prior evaluation has occurred, and, according to Ludwig AI, is grammatically correct. It is frequently employed in news, science, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the review is indeed completed before the main action. Alternatives include "after reviewing" and "upon reviewing", each with slightly different nuances. Remember to avoid incorrect tense usage, and to choose the most concise option for your writing. Ludwig examples from authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian show the proper use and high frequency of this phrase in diverse contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

after reviewing

Emphasizes the chronological sequence; the action of reviewing precedes another action.

upon reviewing

Similar to "after reviewing" but can imply a more immediate or direct consequence.

having assessed

Replaces "reviewed" with a synonym, focusing on evaluation.

once having reviewed

Adds a sense of completion or finality to the review process.

having examined

Similar to "having assessed" but can imply a more detailed inspection.

following a review of

More formal and emphasizes the review as a preceding event.

having considered

Implies a broader evaluation that may include more than just a formal review.

with the review completed

Highlights the state of the review being finished rather than the action itself.

after consideration of

Stresses the act of considering different aspects before making a decision.

reviewing

A more simple version of this term, can be used when the context is implicit

FAQs

How to use "having reviewed" in a sentence?

Use "having reviewed" at the beginning of a sentence to indicate that a document, situation, or evidence has been examined before reaching a conclusion. For example, "Having reviewed the report, we decided to proceed with the project."

What can I say instead of "having reviewed"?

You can use alternatives like "after reviewing", "upon reviewing", or "once having reviewed" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "after having reviewed"?

Yes, "after having reviewed" is grammatically correct, but "having reviewed" alone is often more concise and preferred in formal writing.

What is the difference between "having reviewed" and "reviewing"?

"Having reviewed" implies a completed action prior to the main clause, while "reviewing" can describe an ongoing action or be used as a simple adjective. For example, "Having reviewed the data, we made a decision" versus "Reviewing the data, we noticed a trend".