Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have shredded
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "have shredded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been torn or cut into pieces in the past and may still be in that state. Example: "I have shredded the documents to ensure that no sensitive information is left intact."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
55 human-written examples
The American news media, he said, have shredded his reputation.
News & Media
Mr. Bush's overhaul would have shredded protections for wildlife and limited public input.
News & Media
If I had previously had any respect for or confidence in Republicans, this would have shredded it.
For the third year in a row, leaf-cutter bees have shredded every leaf on my Darlow's Enigma rose.
News & Media
The tumultuous events of the past month have shredded confidence, destroyed trust and left markets in a petrified state.
News & Media
When it was revealed to have shredded documents about Enron, and the Department of Justice decided to bring a criminal indictment against it, Andersen was doomed.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
5 human-written examples
Brexit has shredded that.
News & Media
The North had shredded the Agreed Framework.
News & Media
The crab cake, unfortunately, had shredded rather than lump crab.
News & Media
To make things worse, he had shredded his right knee with Cleveland the previous spring.
News & Media
If Chinese authorities withhold support, more producers will fail, easing the overcapacity that has shredded prices.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "have shredded" in a figurative sense, ensure the context clearly supports the image of tearing apart, as it can add emphasis and emotional impact.
Common error
Avoid using "have shredded" when a passive construction is more appropriate. For example, instead of "The document has been have shredded", use "The document has been shredded" or "The document has been destroyed".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
"Have shredded" functions as a present perfect verb phrase, indicating an action of shredding that was completed at some point in the past and has relevance to the present. Ludwig AI confirms this by listing numerous examples where it describes either a literal or figurative act of destruction.
Frequent in
News & Media
98%
Academia
1%
Science & Research
1%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Science
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "have shredded" is a versatile verb phrase used to describe the action of tearing something into small pieces, both literally and figuratively. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and frequently appears in various contexts, most notably in News & Media. The phrase is used to describe actions completed in the past with present relevance, and while typically neutral in register, it can carry strong connotations of destruction or damage. When writing with "have shredded", ensure the context is clear and supports the image of tearing apart for maximum impact.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
have torn apart
Emphasizes a more violent and complete destruction, implying something was forcefully ripped.
have ripped up
Suggests tearing into multiple pieces, similar to shredding but often implying less precision.
have dismantled
Implies taking something apart systematically, often used for systems or structures.
have destroyed
Indicates complete ruin or devastation, a broader term than shredding which focuses on physical fragmentation.
have undermined
Suggests weakening or damaging something gradually, often used for trust, reputation, or foundations.
have invalidated
Focuses on making something null or void, often used for arguments, claims, or agreements.
have negated
Similar to invalidated, but can also imply canceling out an effect or outcome.
have discredited
Focuses on damaging the credibility or reputation of someone or something.
have pulverized
Implies reducing something to fine particles, a more extreme form of destruction.
have demolished
Suggests completely knocking down or destroying a structure or system.
FAQs
How can I use "have shredded" in a sentence?
You can use "have shredded" to describe the action of tearing something into small pieces, such as "The company is alleged to "have shredded" confidential documents" or "Two years of violence "have shredded" the Israeli economy".
What are some alternatives to "have shredded"?
Alternatives include "have torn apart", "have destroyed", or "have invalidated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "has shredded" instead of "have shredded"?
No, "has shredded" should be used with singular subjects (e.g., "he has shredded"), while "have shredded" is used with plural subjects (e.g., "they have shredded") or the pronoun "I", "you", "we".
What is the difference between "have shredded" and "have torn"?
"Have shredded" implies tearing into many small pieces, often with a shredding machine or similar action. "Have torn" is a more general term for ripping something apart, which may not result in small pieces.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested