have responded to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have responded to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone has replied or reacted to something, such as a question, request, or situation. Example: "The team has responded to the client's feedback and made the necessary adjustments."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Most have responded to the challenge defensively.

The Economist

Some companies have responded to the criticism.

The New York Times

We have responded to that".

The Guardian

Parents have responded to the school's approach.

The New York Times

Retailers have responded to the Promenade.

The New York Times

Some wangbas have responded to the clampdown.

The New York Times - Tech

Some hospitals have responded to the danger.

The Guardian

Some have responded to the orders with derision.

The Economist

Leaders of the affected countries have responded to the tragedy.

Independent

Some states have responded to these insurers with legislation.

The New York Times

The police have responded to accusations of maltreated pigs.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have responded to", ensure that the subject clearly identifies who or what is reacting, and the object specifies the stimulus or situation they are reacting to. For example, "The government has responded to the crisis with new policies."

Common error

A common mistake is using the wrong preposition after "responded". Always use "to" when indicating what someone is reacting to; avoid using "with", "by", or other prepositions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have responded to" typically functions as a verb phrase indicating a reaction, answer, or action taken in relation to a specific stimulus, request, or situation. Ludwig provides numerous examples where this phrase is used to describe how individuals, groups, or organizations react to different circumstances.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have responded to" is a versatile verb phrase used to indicate a reaction or answer to a stimulus. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in News & Media and Science contexts. While alternatives like "have reacted to" or "have replied to" exist, "have responded to" maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse writing scenarios. Remember to use the correct preposition "to" after "responded" to avoid common errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have reacted to

This phrase suggests a more immediate or emotional reaction compared to a measured response.

have replied to

This implies a direct answer or communication in response to a query or message.

have answered to

Similar to 'have replied to', but can also imply accountability or being called upon.

have addressed

Implies dealing with an issue or problem directly and thoughtfully.

have dealt with

Focuses on managing or handling a situation, often a difficult one.

have taken action on

Suggests that steps have been taken as a consequence of something.

have attended to

Indicates that care or service has been given in response to a need.

have counteracted

Implies acting against something, often to neutralize its effects.

have combated

Suggests a more forceful response, often against a threat or problem.

have managed

Highlights the successful handling of a situation or task.

FAQs

How can I use "have responded to" in a sentence?

The phrase "have responded to" indicates a reaction or answer to something. For example, "The company "have responded to" the customer feedback by improving their product".

What are some alternatives to "have responded to"?

You can use alternatives like "have reacted to", "have replied to", or "have addressed" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "have responded with" instead of "have responded to"?

While "have responded with" can be correct in certain contexts, "have responded to" is generally used when indicating a reaction to a specific stimulus. "Have responded with" often describes the means or method of the response.

What's the difference between "have responded to" and "have adapted to"?

"Have responded to" implies a reaction to a specific event or situation, while "have adapted to" suggests a longer-term adjustment to changing circumstances.