Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have removed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "have removed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated in the past and may still have relevance in the present. Example: "We have removed the outdated information from the report to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
They have removed IDs.
News & Media
We have removed the debris.
News & Media
I have removed the photographs you cited.
But he should have removed it anyway.
News & Media
And I shouldn't have removed my headscarf".
News & Media
Both have removed retailers after receiving complaints.
News & Media
Many localities have removed monuments recently.
News & Media
As a result, some states have removed tax incentives.
We have removed number controls from the most competitive institutions.
News & Media
Chinese censors have removed many of the comments.
News & Media
"They have removed the struggle to find anything.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "have removed", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was removed and why. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "have removed" when the action is ongoing or refers to a future event. Use the correct tense, such as "are removing" or "will remove", instead.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "have removed" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It indicates a completed action in the past that has relevance or consequences in the present. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
44%
Science
30%
Academia
8%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "have removed" is a versatile verb phrase indicating the completion of a removal action with present consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use across diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and academic writing. When using "have removed", clarity is key: specify what was removed and why. Alternative phrases like "eliminated" or "taken away" can be used for variety, but understanding the subtle differences in meaning is essential for precise communication. Avoid using this phrase when referring to ongoing or future actions. The frequency and authority of sources using "have removed" underscore its importance in effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
eliminated
This is a shorter, one-word alternative that conveys the same meaning of getting rid of something.
taken away
This alternative uses a phrasal verb to express the action of removing something.
cleared
Implies that something was obstructing or blocking, and now it is gone.
got rid of
An informal way to say that something has been discarded or eliminated.
withdrawn
Suggests a more formal or official removal, often used in contexts like retracting a statement or pulling out of an agreement.
extracted
Suggests that something was taken out from within something else.
excised
Refers to surgically removing something.
taken off
This phrase is used when something has been detached or unfastened.
disposed of
This suggests removing something that is no longer wanted or needed.
deleted
This is used when referring to removing digital or written content.
FAQs
How to use "have removed" in a sentence?
You can use "have removed" to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated in the past and continues to be absent. For example, "We "have removed" the outdated information from the report."
What can I say instead of "have removed"?
You can use alternatives like "eliminated", "taken away", or "got rid of" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "have removed" or "had removed"?
"Have removed" indicates an action completed in the past with present relevance, while "had removed" refers to an action completed before another past action. Choose based on the timeline of events.
What's the difference between "have removed" and "removed"?
"Have removed" (present perfect) emphasizes the current state resulting from a past action, while "removed" (simple past) simply states that the action occurred at a specific time in the past.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested