have quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'have quality' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something having a level of excellence or a good feature. For example, you could say, “This restaurant's food has quality.”.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

General Usage

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"Many teams have quality.

The Guardian - Sport

They all have quality".

The Guardian - Sport

They certainly have quality.

The Guardian - Sport

None of those teams have quality wideouts.

The New York Times

"I have quality people," said Ms. Trinidad.

The New York Times

"Do I really have quality of life?

The New Yorker

"I must have quality," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

"We have quality pitchers all around".

The New York Times - Sports

"Think about the past, have quality conversations.

The Guardian

"We have quality athletes over there," center Jason Scukanee said.

The New York Times - Sports

"We need to have quality substitutions," the coach said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have quality", ensure the context clearly defines what aspects contribute to the described quality, providing a more comprehensive understanding for the audience.

Common error

Avoid using "have quality" in excessively broad or undefined situations. Specify the kind of quality being referred to (e.g., "have high-quality ingredients" instead of simply "have quality").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have quality" functions as a descriptive expression, indicating that a subject possesses desirable or superior attributes. Ludwig examples show its use in contexts ranging from sports teams to abstract concepts like quality of life, supporting its broad applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Sports

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Science

15%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the expression "have quality" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase for describing something that possesses excellent or superior attributes. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's commonly used in news, sports, and general contexts, but should be used with care to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "possess excellence" or "exhibit superior attributes" for variety and clarity. Remember to specify the aspects that contribute to the described quality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

feature impressive qualities

This alternative focuses on highlighting the prominent and striking aspects of something.

possess excellence

This alternative replaces a general attribute with a more emphatic term for high quality.

offer remarkable attributes

This suggests presenting or providing notable and praiseworthy characteristics.

showcase exceptional merits

This alternative emphasizes the demonstration of outstanding advantages or virtues.

demonstrate high caliber

This option emphasizes the level of skill or competence shown.

display top-notch features

This variant highlights the presence of excellent and prominent aspects.

exhibit superior attributes

This alternative uses a more formal and descriptive approach, focusing on notable characteristics.

embody premium aspects

This option focuses on the inclusion of high-value or superior elements.

boast fine characteristics

This alternative suggests possessing impressive or admirable traits.

include choice properties

This option indicates the incorporation of select and desirable characteristics.

FAQs

How can I use "have quality" in a sentence?

You can use "have quality" to describe something possessing excellent characteristics, such as "This product "has quality" craftsmanship" or "The company "has quality" customer service".

What are some alternatives to "have quality"?

Alternatives to "have quality" include phrases like "possess excellence", "exhibit superior attributes", or "demonstrate high caliber", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "has quality" or "is of high quality"?

Both "has quality" and "is of high quality" are grammatically correct, but "is of high quality" is often considered more formal. The choice depends on the context and desired tone.

What does it mean when something is said to "have quality"?

When something is said to "have quality", it means that it possesses superior or excellent attributes, making it desirable or valuable. The specific qualities will vary depending on the subject.