have not replaced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have not replaced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has not been substituted or changed for another thing. Example: "The old software has not replaced the new system, as both are still in use."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

"Well," he said, "they have been, right?" Internet pollsters have not replaced them.

The New Yorker

"Carpeting is the obligation of the county and they have not replaced it.

The New York Times

Quarterly earnings calls are now standard practice but have not replaced one-on-one calls and meetings.

Harvard University

Of course, social networks have not replaced many of the existing tools for collaborating, like Microsoft SharePoint.

The New York Times - Tech

Venky's have not replaced Williams yet, or Finn, who left in May after 15 years at the club.

The Guardian - Sport

Journalism in general has become less profitable as print advertising, which commanded high prices, has crashed, and revenues from digital advertising have not replaced it.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

The red votive candle I haven't replaced yet.

The New York Times - Tech

"Networks of people" haven't replaced "traditional hierarchies".

The Guardian - Tech

If you don't match all of them then you haven't "replaced" religion.

The Guardian - Opinion

No, rock gods haven't replaced getting high and scoring with getting high scores.

The New York Times

You have one, too, unless it broke and you haven't replaced it (understandable but unusual).

The New York Times - Food

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have not replaced", ensure that the context clearly indicates both the original entity and what has failed to replace it. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "has not replaced" when the subject is plural; always use "have" with plural subjects. For example, "New technologies have not replaced traditional methods", not "New technologies has not replaced traditional methods".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have not replaced" functions as a verb phrase expressing a negative perfective aspect. It indicates that an action (replacing) has not been completed, and the original state persists. Ludwig AI confirms this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have not replaced" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to convey that something has not been substituted or displaced. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used in various contexts, ranging from news and media to scientific and academic writing. While alternatives like "have not substituted" or "have not superseded" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. A key consideration is ensuring proper tense usage, particularly aligning the verb "have" with plural subjects. By understanding its function, purpose, and common usage patterns, you can effectively incorporate "have not replaced" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have not substituted

Focuses on the lack of a direct exchange or substitution.

have not superseded

Emphasizes that something has not become obsolete or taken precedence.

have not supplanted

Highlights that something hasn't taken the place of another, often in a forceful way.

have not taken the place of

A more literal way to express that something has not assumed the role of something else.

have not overridden

Implies that a rule, decision, or system is still in effect, unaltered.

have not invalidated

Suggests something's authority or usefulness is kept

have not rendered obsolete

Emphasizes that something is still current and useful, not outmoded by a newer innovation.

have not made redundant

Focuses on the concept that something has not become unnecessary or expendable.

have not eliminated

Implies that a process, object, or idea continues to be actively used.

have not dislodged

Emphasizes a failure to unseat or remove something from a position.

FAQs

What does "have not replaced" mean?

The phrase "have not replaced" indicates that something has not been substituted or taken the place of something else. It implies that the original thing is still present or in use.

What are some alternatives to "have not replaced"?

You can use alternatives like "have not substituted", "have not superseded", or "have not taken the place of" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "have not replaced"?

Yes, "have not replaced" is grammatically correct when used with a plural subject or the pronouns 'I', 'you', 'we', or 'they'. For a singular subject, use "has not replaced".

How can I use "have not replaced" in a sentence?

Here's an example: "Although many new tools are available, they "have not replaced" the fundamental principles of effective communication."