have not provided

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have not provided" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has not been given or supplied by someone or something. Example: "The committee has noted that they have not provided the necessary documents for the review."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

They have not provided any details.

The New York Times

Police have not provided a motive.

The Guardian

The Knicks have not provided that person.

The New York Times - Sports

They have not provided any credible evidence of that.

The New York Times

Courts have not provided much of an answer.

The New York Times

"They have not provided any resources to me," Hockey said.

The Guardian

They have not provided any further details though.

Independent

Q: Northumbria police have been forced to step in because you have not provided staff.

The Guardian

"I note you have not provided a copy of the amendments yet," Shorten told Abbott.

The Guardian

I have not provided any goals, but people have explored, spent time and mucked about.

The Guardian - Tech

As this chart shows, private security companies have not provided good security.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have not provided", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was expected or required but not supplied. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the message.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on "have not provided" in passive constructions. Instead, consider rephrasing to highlight the actor responsible for the failure to provide, making the sentence more direct and impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have not provided" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence of an action; specifically, the action of supplying or giving something. As Ludwig AI states, it is grammatically correct and usable. This function is evident across various examples where something was expected but not delivered.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

41%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have not provided" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to indicate a lack of delivery or supply. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While suitable for various contexts, including news, science, and formal settings, it's crucial to ensure clarity regarding what was expected but not given. Alternatives like "failed to provide" or "did not supply" can be used to tailor the nuance of the message. Being mindful of potential passive voice overuse ensures impactful communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to provide

Emphasizes a failure or inability to supply something that was expected or required. Slightly stronger and more critical than the original phrase.

did not supply

A more direct and simple way of saying that something was not given or furnished.

have not furnished

More formal than "have not provided", implying a complete lack of equipment or resources.

have not delivered

Focuses on the act of transporting or handing over something, implying a failure in the delivery process.

have not given

A basic and straightforward alternative, suitable for simple or informal contexts.

have not offered

Implies a choice or opportunity to provide something that was not taken.

have not presented

Suggests a failure to formally introduce or showcase something.

have not made available

Highlights the lack of accessibility or readiness of something.

have not contributed

Implies a lack of participation or input in providing something.

have not shared

Focuses on the absence of communal or collaborative provision.

FAQs

What does "have not provided" mean?

The phrase "have not provided" means that something was expected or required, but it was not given, supplied, or made available.

What can I say instead of "have not provided"?

You can use alternatives like "failed to provide", "did not supply", or "have not furnished" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "did not provide" or "have not provided"?

Both "did not provide" and "have not provided" are grammatically correct. "Did not provide" refers to a specific instance in the past, while "have not provided" implies a continuing state or a period leading up to the present.

Can "have not provided" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "have not provided" is suitable for formal writing, especially when a neutral tone is needed. In some cases, more formal alternatives like "failed to provide" or "have not furnished" may be more appropriate.