have not committed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have not committed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone has not engaged in a particular action or behavior, often in a legal or moral context. Example: "The defendant has maintained that they have not committed any crime."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Most people inside have not committed crimes.

The New York Times

These people have not committed any crime.

The Guardian

I have not committed a crime since.

The Guardian

Both Jones and Driver have not committed any crime.

The Guardian

The Iranians have started acting in Iraq, though they have not committed many people.

Independent

They associated us with crimes we have not committed, they insult, they attack our freedom.

The Economist

But we should not apologise and beg forgiveness for crimes we have not committed.

The Guardian - Opinion

They have not committed a crime by coming to the port of entry.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

"That's why I haven't committed.

The New York Times - Magazine

You also haven't committed to putting enough money into the NHS".

The Guardian

I haven't committed a crime.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have not committed", ensure that the context clearly specifies what action or crime has not been committed to avoid ambiguity. For example, "They have not committed any crime" is clearer than "They have not committed".

Common error

Avoid using incorrect tenses (e.g., "had not committed" when the present perfect is needed) or subject-verb agreement errors (e.g., "he have not committed"). Always ensure the auxiliary verb "have" agrees with the subject and the tense is appropriate for the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have not committed" functions as a verb phrase within a sentence, typically used to negate the action of committing a crime, offense, or other specific act. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Wiki

18%

Science

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have not committed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase to express that someone has not performed a specific action, particularly a crime or offense. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and versatile, making it suitable for a variety of contexts. It is commonly found in news and media, legal documents, and general discussions. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what action was not committed. Alternatives include "are innocent of" or "did not perpetrate", but "have not committed" remains a clear and widely understood choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are innocent of

This alternative directly states innocence of a particular charge or action.

are not guilty of

This alternative directly expresses a lack of guilt.

did not perpetrate

This phrase is a more formal way of saying someone did not carry out a specific act.

have not engaged in

This phrase is a more neutral way of saying someone did not participate in a specific activity.

are blameless in

This indicates a lack of responsibility or fault in a situation.

are not implicated in

This suggests a lack of involvement in a particular event or situation, often one that is negative.

bear no responsibility for

This emphasizes a lack of accountability for something.

are not accountable for

Similar to 'bear no responsibility', this highlights a lack of obligation.

remained uninvolved in

This emphasizes a conscious decision to stay out of a situation.

have no part in

This indicates a lack of participation or contribution to something.

FAQs

How can I use "have not committed" in a sentence?

Use "have not committed" to state that someone or something has not performed a specific action, often a crime or misdeed. For example, "The suspect claims they "have not committed" the robbery."

What's the difference between "have not committed" and "did not commit"?

"Have not committed" (present perfect) often implies a continuing state or relevance to the present, while "did not commit" (simple past) refers to a completed action in the past. For example, "They "have not committed" any further offenses since then" suggests an ongoing clean record, whereas "They "did not commit" the crime" simply states a past fact.

What can I say instead of "have not committed"?

Alternatives include "are innocent of", "are not guilty of", or "have not engaged in", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "has not committed" instead of "have not committed"?

Yes, but the choice depends on the subject. Use "has not committed" with singular subjects (e.g., "He "has not committed" any crimes"), and "have not committed" with plural subjects (e.g., "They "have not committed" any crimes").