have not been validated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have not been validated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing something that has not yet been confirmed, verified, or approved. Example: "The results of the experiment have not been validated, so we cannot draw any conclusions yet."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Existing models have not been validated independently.

Injury

However, these grading systems have not been validated.

Fertility and Sterility

"Results have not been validated by operational analysts," the report said.

The Washington Post

Further, these CFD models have not been validated by detailed comparison with experimental measurements.

Chemical Engineering Science

The questionnaires on QoPL and burnout, Spanish version self-administered format have not been validated.

Investigación en Educación Médica

Published scoring systems have not been validated in prospective assessments of unselected patients.

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

However, red flags have not been validated and pediatric studies are lacking.

The Journal of Pediatrics

However, some of these more recent methods have not been validated by follow-up studies.

Ophthalmology

In addition, the majority have not been validated by empirical data.

Geomorphology

However, these findings have not been validated.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

The criteria have not been validated against an autopsy standard.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "have not been validated", clearly state what specifically lacks validation and the potential implications of this lack of validation.

Common error

Avoid drawing definitive conclusions or making strong assertions based on information that "have not been validated". Emphasize the need for further investigation and verification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have not been validated" functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence of confirmation or verification. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound way to express that something lacks proper supporting evidence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

14%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have not been validated" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that something lacks confirmation or verification. As Ludwig AI points out, its usage spans across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and academic writing. When using this phrase, it's essential to specify what exactly lacks validation and to avoid drawing strong conclusions from unvalidated information. Alternatives such as "have not been confirmed" or "lack validation" can also be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. By understanding its proper usage and context, you can effectively communicate the limitations of current knowledge and the need for further investigation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have not been confirmed

Emphasizes the absence of proof or confirmation of something.

have not been verified

Highlights the lack of verification or checking for accuracy.

have not been substantiated

Focuses on the absence of evidence to support a claim or finding.

have not been proven

Stresses the lack of conclusive proof or demonstration of truth.

lack validation

A more concise way of saying that something does not have validation.

remain unvalidated

Indicates that the validation process has not yet occurred.

are yet to be validated

Highlights that validation is expected in the future but hasn't happened yet.

have not undergone validation

Focuses on the process of validation not being completed.

are without validation

Stresses the current state of lacking validation.

have not been tested

Emphasizes the lack of testing to confirm the results or findings.

FAQs

How can I use "have not been validated" in a sentence?

You can use "have not been validated" to indicate that certain findings, methods, or data lack proper confirmation or verification. For example, "The results of this study "have not been validated" by independent research."

What are some alternatives to "have not been validated"?

Alternatives to "have not been validated" include "have not been confirmed", "have not been verified", or "lack validation". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it acceptable to use "have not been validated" in formal writing?

Yes, "have not been validated" is perfectly acceptable in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent use in scientific, news, and academic contexts.

What's the difference between "have not been validated" and "have not been tested"?

"Have not been validated" implies that a process of confirmation or verification is lacking, while "have not been tested" suggests that a formal evaluation or trial has not been conducted. Validation is a broader concept that can include testing but also encompasses other forms of verification.