have not accommodated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have not accommodated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where someone or something has failed to provide necessary adjustments or support. Example: "Despite our efforts to communicate our needs, the management have not accommodated our requests for flexible working hours."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

A majority of synthetic time series of TCs to date, particularly those based on historical records, have not accommodated this non-stationarity.

Geoscience Letters

However, these early applications of meta-analyses on such datasets have not accommodated between-study heterogeneity in the data synthesis.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"The school system is almost one-third immigrants, and the educational system has not accommodated their needs over the last 10 years.

The New York Times

Specifically, the Palestinians expressed anger that the Israelis had not accommodated Palestinian requests to gain control of villages near Jerusalem when the Israelis drew up the maps for their next withdrawal from the West Bank, which was supposed to have proceeded next week.

The New York Times

EPA's structure "has not accommodated science at the level it needs to be," Risser says.

Science Magazine

The relationship between different tax rates and retirement patterns is strong evidence that pensions and other benefits have not merely accommodated an existing trend in retirement ages, but have reinforced it.What should governments do about this?

The Economist

Regardless, based on students' response patterns, it appears that they have not sufficiently accommodated non-adaptive factors into their evolutionary reasoning frameworks, even after advanced instruction in evolution.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Not everyone will be happy but Snellgrove is confident that if certain clubs' requests have not been accommodated then at least he will be able to explain why.

BBC

For the first time since Eisenhower you have someone who has clearly not accommodated the conservative wing winning the nomination.

The New Yorker

"For the first time since Eisenhower, Newt Gingrichh told me, "you have someone who has clearly not accommodated the conservative wing winning the nomination.

The New Yorker

-- and that with McCain, "for the first time since Eisenhower, you have someone who has clearly not accommodated the conservative wing winning the nomination.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have not accommodated", ensure the subject and object are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify who or what "has not accommodated" whom or what.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "have not accommodated" implies intentional neglect. Sometimes, the failure to accommodate stems from unforeseen circumstances or limitations, not necessarily a deliberate choice.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have not accommodated" functions as a verb phrase indicating a lack of adjustment, provision, or consideration. Ludwig AI examples show its use in contexts where needs or requests have not been met, or where systems or designs have failed to adapt.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Academia

5%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have not accommodated" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to indicate a failure to adjust, provide for, or consider something. Ludwig AI confirms this. While not extremely frequent, it appears across diverse contexts, from scientific literature to news reports. When using the expression, ensure clarity by specifying who or what did not accommodate whom or what. While authoritative sources employ this phrase, be mindful of the potential for misinterpretations, as failing to accommodate does not always imply deliberate neglect. Therefore, "have not accommodated" serves as a neutral means of pointing out deficiencies or unmet needs in a variety of professional and formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not provide for

Focuses on the absence of specific provisions or arrangements.

failed to adjust to

Highlights the lack of adaptation to changing circumstances.

did not make allowances for

Emphasizes a lack of consideration or tolerance for something.

were not adapted for

Focuses on a design or structure that wasn't modified to suit particular needs.

did not take into account

Highlights the omission of certain factors from consideration.

failed to consider

Highlights the lack of consideration.

did not cater to

Specifically addresses the lack of catering to particular needs or preferences.

were not designed for

Focuses on the original intention or design not including certain features.

did not allow for

Emphasizes the absence of permission or possibility for something.

failed to include

Highlights the omission of elements or details.

FAQs

How can I use "have not accommodated" in a sentence?

Use "have not accommodated" to indicate a lack of adjustment or provision for something. For example, "The system updates "have not accommodated" older hardware."

What are some alternatives to "have not accommodated"?

Alternatives include "failed to adjust to", "did not provide for", or "did not cater to" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "did not accommodate" or "have not accommodated"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "have not accommodated" is generally preferred when referring to a situation that continues to the present, whereas "did not accommodate" refers to a specific past event.

What's the difference between "have not accommodated" and "have not considered"?

"Have not accommodated" implies a failure to adjust or make provisions, while "have not considered" means something has not been taken into account. They focus on different aspects of omission.