have negatively affected

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have negatively affected" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the impact of an action or event that has had adverse effects on something or someone. Example: "The recent policy changes have negatively affected the morale of the employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It also says that the women's claims have negatively affected his existing business arrangements.

The Guardian

"Therefore, the tax cut push may have negatively affected his ability to be perceived as steady economic leader".

The New York Times

However, they voted against a more aggressive move since it wasn't anticipated by the markets and could have negatively affected sterling and undermined confidence in the UK economy.

The Guardian - Business

Much has been written about why the Bush administration's policies have negatively affected the role the United States plays in the world.

The New York Times

"We have evidence that we may have increased children's technical ability to read but may also have negatively affected their enjoyment of doing it," says Wray. "Kids are less likely to get lost in a book and read for fun".

The Guardian

Most speakers today were under the age of twenty-one, but beyond that, the students who addressed the crowd in D.C. were united by the ways in which guns have negatively affected their lives.

The New Yorker

A critical break with the Assad regime in Syria (the ripples of which have negatively affected its relationship with its key benefactor, Iran) took away key elements of their regional support.

The Guardian - Opinion

Furthermore, it is untrue that affirmative actions programmes have negatively affected white people: white men still hold 95-97% of senior level corporate jobs, despite making up only 29% of the workforce.

The Guardian - Opinion

That havoc would, in turn, have contributed to a recession, which would have negatively affected labour markets adding to stress on borrowers, and so on.

The Economist

The university's chancellor, Dan Jones, said, "All of us are ashamed of the few students who have negatively affected the reputations of each of us and of our university".

The New York Times

The developing economies have negatively affected sustainability of natural resources.

Ocean & Coastal Management

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have negatively affected", ensure the subject causing the negative effect is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. Be specific about what has been impacted.

Common error

Avoid using "have negatively affected" in passive constructions where the actor is obscured. Instead of "Morale has been negatively affected by the changes", specify: "The policy changes /s/have+negatively+affected morale /s/.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have negatively affected" functions as a verb phrase indicating that a subject has had an adverse impact on something else. According to Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. The examples show it is used to describe consequences across diverse domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have negatively affected" is a versatile and frequently used verb phrase that clearly expresses a detrimental impact or consequence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely accepted across different contexts. While alternatives like ""have adversely impacted"" or ""have harmed"" exist, "/s/have+negatively+affected/s/" offers a balanced approach suitable for neutral to professional registers. Remember to clearly identify both the cause and the affected entity when using this phrase to maintain clarity and precision in your writing. Steer clear of overly passive constructions to amplify impact. The phrase is prevalent across diverse domains, especially in science and news, solidifying its relevance in both analytical and reporting contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have adversely impacted

Replaces "negatively affected" with "adversely impacted", maintaining a similar level of formality and meaning. This alternative emphasizes the impact or consequence of the action.

have negatively impacted upon

Adds the preposition "upon" after "impacted", which is grammatically correct but slightly more formal and less common.

have been damaging to

Expresses the negative effect as being "damaging to", which is a more descriptive and emphatic alternative.

have detrimentally influenced

Substitutes "negatively affected" with "detrimentally influenced", highlighting the negative influence or change caused by something.

have harmed

Uses the simpler term "harmed" instead of "negatively affected", conveying a direct and clear sense of damage or injury.

have impaired

Replaces "negatively affected" with "impaired", which suggests a weakening or diminishing effect on something's function or quality.

have had adverse consequences for

Expresses the negative effect by highlighting the adverse consequences that resulted.

have undermined

Substitutes "negatively affected" with "undermined", which indicates a weakening or destabilizing effect.

have hampered

Replaces "negatively affected" with "hampered", suggesting that something has been hindered or slowed down.

have exerted a negative influence on

Replaces "negatively affected" with a more verbose phrase, emphasizing the exertion of a negative influence.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "have negatively affected"?

Alternatives include "have adversely impacted", "have detrimentally influenced", or a simpler term like "have harmed" depending on the context.

How can I use "have negatively affected" in a sentence?

Ensure that the subject causing the negative effect and the object being affected are clearly identified. For example: "The budget cuts /s/have+negatively+affected the research program/s/." Using active voice often provides more clarity.

What's the difference between "have negatively affected" and "have negatively impacted"?

The phrases are largely interchangeable. "Have negatively impacted" is slightly more formal and emphasizes the impact or consequence, while "/s/have+negatively+affected/s/" is a more general term.

Is it always appropriate to use "have negatively affected" in formal writing?

Yes, it's appropriate, but consider stronger verbs like "harmed", "impaired", or "undermined" if they more precisely capture the nature of the negative impact. These alternatives can make your writing more concise and impactful.