have identified

USAGE SUMMARY

"have identified" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something that was found or discovered. For example: "After extensive research, scientists have identified a new species of animal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Scientists have identified another factor.

The New York Times - Science

We have identified today's problems.

The Guardian

I would have identified with that.

The New York Times

Management thinkers have identified at least three.

The Economist

I have identified such a person".

The New York Times

Phoneticians have identified a few telltale traits.

The Guardian - Opinion

"I wish we could have identified everybody.

The New York Times

From Day 1, those fans have identified with this club".

The New York Times - Sports

They have identified 17 distinct investigations under the overall inquiry.

The Guardian

"However, we have identified some areas for further improvement.

The Guardian

People on Twitter have identified you in a photo".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "have identified" when you want to clearly state that something has been found, recognized, or determined through a process.

Common error

Avoid using "have identified" when the context requires a different tense. For example, if discussing a past event, use "had identified" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have identified" functions as the present perfect tense of the verb 'to identify'. It typically indicates a completed action with present relevance. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples across various sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have identified" is a versatile phrase used to indicate the completion of an identification process, with ongoing relevance. As Ludwig AI highlights, this phrase is grammatically sound and frequently appears in news, scientific reports, and formal communications. While generally neutral in tone, its precision makes it suitable for professional contexts. Remember to ensure consistent tense and explore synonyms like "have detected" or "have discovered" to enhance your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have detected

Focuses on the act of discovering something, often through technical means or observation.

have discovered

Emphasizes the finding of something previously unknown.

have ascertained

Highlights the process of finding something out for certain after investigation.

have determined

Stresses the act of reaching a firm conclusion after consideration.

have pinpointed

Focuses on locating something precisely.

have recognized

Highlights the acknowledgment or awareness of something.

have established

Emphasizes the act of proving or showing something to be true.

have located

Focuses on finding the specific place or position of something.

have uncovered

Suggests revealing something that was previously hidden or unknown.

have discerned

Implies perceiving or recognizing something subtle or difficult to detect.

FAQs

How to use "have identified" in a sentence?

Use "have identified" to indicate that something has been discovered, recognized, or determined. For example, "Scientists "have identified" a new gene responsible for the disease".

What can I say instead of "have identified"?

You can use alternatives like "have detected", "have discovered", or "have ascertained" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "have identified" or "identified"?

"Have identified" is the present perfect tense, indicating an action completed at an unspecified time in the past or that continues to have relevance in the present. "Identified" is the simple past tense, referring to a completed action in the past with no implied connection to the present.

What's the difference between "have identified" and "are identifying"?

"Have identified" indicates a completed action of identifying, while "are identifying" is the present continuous tense, describing an ongoing process of identification.