Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have conversations
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"have conversations" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, you could say "I enjoy having conversations with my friends and family about interesting topics".
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
"We have conversations".
News & Media
"We don't have conversations, period.
News & Media
You have conversations, maybe.
News & Media
We will have conversations about that".
News & Media
"We would have conversations about that".
News & Media
We continue to have conversations about that".
News & Media
I used to have conversations with him.
News & Media
"I have conversations with them," he said.
News & Media
We have conversations about marriage equality.
News & Media
"I came to have conversations with them".
News & Media
"In Australia we have conversations about censorship.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "have conversations" to describe general instances of people talking and exchanging ideas. It is appropriate for most contexts, both formal and informal.
Common error
While "have conversations" is perfectly acceptable, avoid repetitive use by varying your language. Consider alternatives like "discuss", "chat", or "exchange ideas" to add nuance and prevent monotony in your writing.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "have conversations" functions as a verb phrase, describing the action of engaging in talk with one or more people. It's a common way to express the idea of exchanging thoughts, ideas, or information, as supported by Ludwig AI's analysis.
Frequent in
News & Media
64%
Wiki
14%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Science
5%
Academia
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "have conversations" is a grammatically correct and versatile way to describe the act of talking and exchanging ideas. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It's very common across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Wiki sources. While appropriate for both formal and informal settings, consider diversifying your language with alternatives like "discuss" or "engage in dialogue" to avoid repetition. Be mindful of the context to choose the most fitting expression for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
speak with
A more general and neutral alternative.
hold discussions
Similar to "have conversations" but implies a more organized and potentially serious exchange.
engage in dialogue
This alternative suggests a more formal and structured exchange.
chat with
Implies a casual, informal conversation.
exchange ideas
This phrase emphasizes the sharing of thoughts rather than the general act of talking.
exchange views
Highlights the swapping of perspectives during the conversation.
talk things over
Suggests a more intimate or problem-solving type of conversation.
share thoughts
Focuses on the act of revealing one's ideas.
interact verbally
A more technical or academic way to describe conversation.
commune with
Implies a deeper, more spiritual connection during the conversation.
FAQs
How can I use "have conversations" in a sentence?
You can use "have conversations" to describe the act of talking with someone, such as: "We often "have conversations" about current events".
What are some alternatives to "have conversations"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "hold discussions", "engage in dialogue", or simply "speak with".
Is it more formal to say "hold discussions" instead of "have conversations"?
"Hold discussions" is generally considered more formal than "have conversations", suggesting a more structured and potentially serious exchange of ideas. "Have conversations" is suitable for both formal and informal settings.
Can "have conversations" be used in professional settings?
Yes, "have conversations" is appropriate for professional settings, especially when describing informal discussions or exchanges. However, for more formal contexts like meetings or presentations, phrases like "conduct meetings" or "hold discussions" might be more suitable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested