Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

have consequences for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have consequences for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when talking about the potential effects of one particular action or set of actions. For example, "Continued bad behavior in school will have consequences for the student's grades and future promotion opportunities."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Both have consequences for education.

News & Media

The New York Times

This could have consequences for the coalition.

News & Media

The Economist

Failure to settle matters rapidly will have consequences for Argentina.

But Brexit could have consequences for the bins.

News & Media

The Guardian

However, it may also have consequences for democratic countries, too.

The findings also have consequences for carrier screening strategies.

This can have consequences for their own well-being.

This would soon have consequences for the American industry.

But the activities, while legal, could have consequences for consumers.

News & Media

The New York Times

"So much of our lives involves making decisions that have consequences for the future," Loewenstein says.

Buying the wrong financial product can have consequences for the rest of your life.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have consequences for", ensure that the link between the action and its consequences is clear and direct. Avoid vague statements and specify the affected entity or area.

Common error

Avoid using "have consequences for" when the effects are minor or insignificant. Overusing this phrase for trivial matters dilutes its impact and credibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have consequences for" functions as a verb phrase that introduces the result or outcome of a particular action, decision, or situation. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct. The phrase highlights the impact on a specific entity or area.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have consequences for" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate that a specific action or event will lead to particular results. Ludwig AI validates its correctness. Its frequency is high across various contexts, including news, science, and academia. When using the phrase, clarity and directness are key to effectively conveying the link between the cause and effect. While versatile, it's important to ensure the severity of the consequences aligns with the situation to maintain credibility. Alternatives like "lead to implications for" or "result in ramifications for" can offer nuanced variations. Overall, "have consequences for" is a valuable tool for clear and impactful communication.

FAQs

How can I use "have consequences for" in a sentence?

Use "have consequences for" to show that an action or decision will lead to specific results or effects. For instance, "Ignoring safety protocols will "have consequences for" worker safety and productivity".

What are some alternatives to "have consequences for"?

You can use alternatives like "lead to implications for", "result in ramifications for", or "create an impact on" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "have implications for" or "have consequences for"?

"Have implications for" generally suggests broader, more far-reaching effects, while ""have consequences for"" often refers to more direct and immediate results. The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "have consequences for" and "affect"?

"Affect" indicates an influence or impact, while ""have consequences for"" suggests a more significant and direct outcome resulting from a specific action. "Affect" is a more general term, while ""have consequences for"" implies a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: