have been revised

USAGE SUMMARY

'have been revised' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when saying that something has been changed or updated after it was previously written or created. For example, "The budget estimates have been revised to account for recent economic changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No acetabular components have been revised or are pending revision.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Those estimates have been revised upward recently.

The New York Times

But the rules have been revised.

The Guardian - Opinion

Some details have been revised since then.

Independent

Perceptions about Özil have been revised over the past year.

The Guardian - Sport

Energy subsidies have been revised downwards or scrapped altogether.

The Guardian

Since then, the national accounts have been revised.

The Economist

But revenue targets have been revised downward several times.

The New York Times

But their projections for 2005 are split: in ten countries, GDP growth forecasts have been revised up; in ten others they have been revised down.

The Economist

What's more, last year's borrowing figures have been revised down from £141.1bn to £139.4bn.

The Guardian - Business

However much the book was revised, it should have been revised more.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have been revised", specify what aspects have been changed to provide clarity and context for your readers.

Common error

While "have been revised" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound weak. Consider active voice alternatives when appropriate for a more direct and engaging style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been revised" functions as a present perfect passive construction. It indicates that a subject has undergone a process of review and alteration. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

41%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have been revised" is a grammatically correct and common way to indicate that something has been modified or updated. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is suitable in written English. It's frequently found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When using "have been revised", specifying the aspects that have been changed enhances clarity. Be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice. Consider active voice alternatives when appropriate. Alternative phrases such as "have been updated" or "have been amended" can be used based on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been updated

Focuses on bringing something current, implying the removal of outdated information.

have been amended

Suggests a formal or legal correction or addition.

have been modified

Indicates a change in form or character, potentially less formal than "amended".

have been altered

Implies a change that might affect the nature or appearance.

have been adjusted

Highlights a change made to improve accuracy or suitability.

have been corrected

Emphasizes the removal of errors or faults.

have been reworked

Indicates a more significant overhaul or redesign.

have been improved

Highlights positive changes that enhance quality or performance.

have undergone changes

A more general statement that changes have occurred, without specifying the nature of the changes.

have been transformed

Suggests a fundamental change in nature or condition.

FAQs

How to use "have been revised" in a sentence?

Use "have been revised" when you want to indicate that something has been changed or updated. For example, "The initial estimates "have been revised" due to new data".

What can I say instead of "have been revised"?

You can use alternatives like "have been updated", "have been amended", or "have been modified" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "have been revised" or "was revised"?

"Have been revised" indicates a present perfect passive construction, meaning the revision happened at an unspecified time in the past and is still relevant. "Was revised" is past passive, indicating a completed action in the past with less emphasis on present relevance. The correct choice depends on the context.

What's the difference between "have been revised" and "are being revised"?

"Have been revised" indicates that something has already been changed, while "are being revised" indicates that something is currently in the process of being changed. The choice depends on whether the action is completed or ongoing.