Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have been reviewed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"have been reviewed" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is a form of the verb "to review." You can use it when talking about something that has been examined or considered by someone else. For example: "The documents have been reviewed by the legal department and approved."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
were examined
were assessed
were inspected
were evaluated
were checked
were investigated
were scrutinized
were considered
were analyzed
have been superseded
have been offered
have been kept
have been dismissed
have been implemented
have been strengthened
have been solving
have received notice
have been improved
have been excluded
have been attributed
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Both have been reviewed.
News & Media
The inmates' cases have been reviewed.
News & Media
The modern researches have been reviewed.
Science
A number of cases have been reviewed by nonpolitical prosecutors.
News & Media
Handling says security plans have been reviewed in Toronto.
News & Media
The CORONAS-F mission experiments and results have been reviewed.
Science
All materials have been reviewed by rabbis and scientists.
Academia
All of the cases have been reviewed by lawyers.
News & Media
It should certainly have been reviewed by the referee.
News & Media
Recent developments in porous silicon gas sensors have been reviewed.
Four investigation reports have been reviewed in detail.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "have been reviewed", ensure the context clearly indicates who conducted the review and what criteria were used.
Common error
Avoid using "have been reviewed" excessively in sentences where the actor is unknown or unimportant. Whenever possible, restructure the sentence to highlight the reviewer for clarity and conciseness.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "have been reviewed" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject has undergone examination or assessment. This usage, as validated by Ludwig, commonly appears to convey that a process of inspection or evaluation has taken place.
Frequent in
Science
36%
News & Media
33%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Wiki
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "have been reviewed" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that something has been examined or assessed. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and broad applicability. It is frequently found in scientific and news contexts, with a more neutral to professional register. When using the phrase, ensure clarity about who performed the review and the criteria used. While the passive voice construction is valid, avoid overuse by highlighting the reviewer when possible to improve sentence clarity and impact. Related phrases, such as "were examined" or "were assessed", can offer stylistic variations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were examined
Focuses on the act of examination rather than a formal review process.
were assessed
Emphasizes the evaluation aspect, highlighting the judgment made.
were inspected
Suggests a close and careful look, often for quality or compliance.
were evaluated
Similar to "were assessed", but may imply a more formal or structured evaluation.
were checked
Implies a simpler, less formal review, focusing on verification.
were investigated
Suggests a more in-depth inquiry to uncover facts or issues.
were audited
Specifically refers to a formal financial or operational review.
were scrutinized
Indicates a critical and detailed examination, often with suspicion.
were considered
Highlights the process of thinking about something, rather than a thorough review.
were analyzed
Emphasizes the detailed study and examination of the components or structure of something.
FAQs
How can I use "have been reviewed" in a sentence?
Use "have been reviewed" to indicate that something has undergone examination or assessment. For example, "The documents "have been reviewed" by the legal team".
What are some alternatives to "have been reviewed"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "were examined", "were assessed", or "were inspected" as alternatives to "have been reviewed".
Is "have been reviewed" grammatically correct?
Yes, "have been reviewed" is grammatically correct. It's the present perfect passive form of the verb "to review."
What does it mean when something "has been reviewed"?
It means that someone has examined or assessed something, typically to provide feedback, approval, or identify issues.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested