have been identify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have been identify" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "have been identified"? If this is the case, you can use it when referring to something that has been recognized or determined in the past and continues to be relevant. Example: "Several key issues have been identified in the report that need to be addressed immediately."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Many other cell surface, extra-cellular matrix or cell adhesion genes have been identify as potential targets for cancer therapy in astrocytic tumors.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

No suspects have been identified.

The New York Times

Few have been identified.

The New York Times - Health

None have been identified.

The New York Times

No remains have been identified.

The New York Times

No bodies have been identified.

The Guardian

Three kinds have been identified.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

No threats have been identified, he said.

The New York Times - Sports

At least four officers have been identified.

Independent

So far, none have been identified.

The New York Times

Eight different porphyrias have been identified.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the past participle form "identified" after "have been" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, "The causes have been identified" is correct.

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb after "have been". The correct structure requires the past participle (e.g., identified) or the present participle (e.g., identifying) depending on the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been identify" functions incorrectly as it attempts to use the base form of the verb "identify" after the auxiliary verbs "have been". According to Ludwig AI, the correct form requires the past participle "identified".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have been identify" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "have been identified". This correction is crucial for ensuring clarity and accuracy in writing. Ludwig AI highlights this error, emphasizing the need for the past participle form after the auxiliary verbs "have been". While examples exist where the phrase is used, these are outweighed by the grammatical rule. Using the correct form will enhance the credibility and understandability of your writing across various contexts, including scientific and news media.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been identified

Changes the verb "identify" to its past participle form, correcting the grammatical structure.

have been recognizing

Uses a continuous tense to emphasize the ongoing process of identification.

have been pinpointing

Replaces "identify" with "pinpointing", focusing on precision in locating or identifying something.

have been detecting

Emphasizes the discovery aspect rather than the naming or categorizing aspect of identifying.

have been uncovering

Focuses on revealing something previously hidden, a more exploratory connotation.

have been discerning

Suggests a careful and perceptive process of distinguishing or recognizing.

have been establishing

Highlights the act of setting up or proving something rather than merely recognizing it.

have been ascertaining

Emphasizes confirming or verifying something with certainty.

have been classifying

Shifts the focus to categorization rather than simple identification.

have been diagnosing

Implies identifying a condition or problem, typically in a medical or technical context.

FAQs

What is the correct grammatical form: "have been identify" or "have been identified"?

The correct grammatical form is "have been identified". The phrase "have been identify" is grammatically incorrect.

How to use "have been identified" in a sentence?

You can use "have been identified" to indicate that something has been recognized or determined. For example: "Several key issues have been identified in the report."

What are some alternatives to "have been identified"?

Alternatives include "have been recognized", "have been detected", or "have been uncovered", depending on the context.

Is there a difference in meaning between "have been identified" and "have been identifying"?

Yes, "have been identified" indicates a completed action of recognizing something, while "have been identifying" suggests an ongoing process of recognition.