have been divided

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have been divided" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been separated or split into parts at some point in the past and continues to be in that state. Example: "The resources have been divided among the various departments to ensure efficient use."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Critics have been divided.

The Guardian - Film

Courts have been divided on the issue.

The New York Times

House Republicans have been divided on the merits of earmarks.

The New York Times

Elected officials have been divided on the auction proposal.

The New York Times

Some investors think it still does.Big shareholders have been divided.

The Economist

Historically, stallions have been divided into 40 shares.

The Economist

Pro-Europeans have been divided from anti-Europeans.

The Economist

Those close to Winehouse have been divided over the film.

Independent

Some of its mansions have been divided into units.

The New York Times

Some of the buildings have been divided into apartments.

The New York Times

Australian intelligence and law enforcement officials have been divided over Mr. Hicks's status.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have been divided", ensure clarity about the basis for the division. Specify the criteria or categories used to make the separation.

Common error

Avoid using "have been divided" without specifying how or why something was divided. Ambiguity can confuse the reader. Always clarify the basis for the separation or categorization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been divided" functions as a passive perfect construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of separation or categorization. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples where it's used to describe how things are grouped or partitioned.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

54%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have been divided" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction, particularly within scientific and news contexts, as determined by Ludwig. It effectively conveys the state of something post-division, separation, or categorization. While generally neutral in tone, the formality can shift based on the source and subject matter. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is both correct and widely applicable in various writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been separated

Focuses on the act of making things distinct or apart.

have been split

Emphasizes a physical or conceptual partitioning.

have been categorized

Highlights the placement into distinct groups based on shared attributes.

have been classified

Implies a more formal or scientific system of grouping.

have been grouped

Suggests a collection into clusters for a specific purpose.

have been partitioned

Indicates a division into sections or segments.

have been allocated

Focuses on the distribution or assignment of something among different recipients.

have been assorted

Highlights the variety within a collection after being divided.

have been fragmented

Implies a breaking into smaller, disconnected pieces.

have been demarcated

Emphasizes the setting of clear boundaries or limits.

FAQs

How can I use "have been divided" in a sentence?

You can use "have been divided" to indicate that something has been separated into distinct parts or groups. For example, "The experimental results "have been divided" into three distinct parts."

What are some alternatives to "have been divided"?

Alternatives include "have been split", "have been separated", or "have been categorized", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "have been divided" or "were divided"?

"Have been divided" implies a state resulting from a past action that continues to be relevant in the present. "Were divided" simply describes a past action without necessarily implying ongoing relevance. Choose the option that best fits the context.

Which is correct: "the class has been divided" or "the class have been divided"?

The correct usage is "the class has been divided". "Class" is a singular collective noun. If you are referring to the individual members of the class, you could say "the members of the class have been divided".