have been disclosed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have been disclosed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information that has been made known or revealed, often in a formal or legal context. Example: "The details of the agreement have been disclosed to the public following the press conference."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They should therefore have been disclosed.

The Economist

Other court orders have been disclosed.

The New York Times

If so, they should have been disclosed.

The Economist

No offences have been disclosed".

The Guardian

No details have been disclosed.

The Guardian

Her telephone numbers have been disclosed.

The New York Times

Under TARP, these would have been disclosed.

The New York Times

(No financial terms have been disclosed).

The New York Times

No financial terms of the deal have been disclosed.

The New York Times - Tech

"In retrospect, that should have been disclosed," he said.

The New York Times

No financial details of the deal have been disclosed.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have been disclosed", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is doing the disclosing and what is being disclosed. This adds clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice constructions like "have been disclosed" when active voice would be more direct and engaging. Overuse can make your writing sound weak or evasive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been disclosed" functions as a passive construction indicating that certain information or details have been revealed or made known. It often appears in formal contexts, emphasizing the state of being revealed rather than the actor doing the revealing. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have been disclosed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that conveys the revelation of information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for formal and neutral contexts, particularly in news, science, and academic writing. While direct and widely understood, consider if using an active voice might improve clarity and engagement, and be specific about what has been disclosed and by whom.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been revealed

Focuses on uncovering something previously hidden.

have been made public

Emphasizes the act of sharing information with a broad audience.

have been unveiled

Suggests a formal or ceremonial disclosure.

have been brought to light

Highlights the process of discovery and exposure.

have been communicated

Focuses on the act of conveying information.

have been reported

Indicates information shared through official channels or media.

have been divulged

Implies the sharing of confidential or sensitive information.

have been exposed

Suggests the uncovering of something scandalous or previously concealed.

have been ascertained

Focuses on the process of finding something out for certain.

have been brought to attention

Indicates that something has been made noticeable or considered.

FAQs

How is "have been disclosed" used in a sentence?

The phrase "have been disclosed" indicates that information has been revealed or made known. For example: "The financial details "have been disclosed" to the investors."

What are some alternatives to "have been disclosed"?

You can use alternatives such as "have been revealed", "have been made public", or "have been unveiled", depending on the context.

When should I use "have been disclosed" versus "were disclosed"?

"Have been disclosed" is present perfect tense, indicating an action completed at an unspecified time in the past that has relevance to the present. "Were disclosed" is past tense, indicating a completed action in the past with no direct relevance to the present. For example: "The documents "have been disclosed", and now we can proceed" versus "The documents "were disclosed" last week."

Is it better to use active or passive voice with phrases like "have been disclosed"?

While "have been disclosed" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and clear. For example, instead of "The results "have been disclosed" by the company", you could say "The company disclosed the results".