have be published

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have be published" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "have been published"? If this is the case, you can use it when referring to works or documents that have already been made public or released. Example: "The research findings have been published in a reputable journal."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Details of earlier results have be published elsewhere [16] [19].

Plosone

Two meta-analyses assessing associations between these polymorphisms and asthma risk have be published [ 9, 10].

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Nine volumes have been published so far.

The New Yorker

But should it have been published?

The New York Times

Several translations into English have been published.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Numerous literatures have been published.

Construction and Building Materials

Three have been published.

The New Yorker

participants also have been published.

Cornell University

Numerous excerpts have been published.

The New York Times

No results have been published.

The Washington Post

Pragmatist anthologies have been published.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct form "have been published" when referring to works that have been made public. Double-check your grammar, especially the auxiliary verbs.

Common error

Avoid mixing up "have be" with "have been". "Have be" is grammatically incorrect. Remember that "been" is the past participle of "be" and is needed after "have" to form the present perfect passive voice.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have be published" is intended to function as part of a passive voice construction within the present perfect tense. However, it fails to do so correctly due to the incorrect usage of the auxiliary verb. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct form requires the past participle "been."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have be published" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "have been published". As Ludwig AI indicates, the issue lies in the incorrect use of the auxiliary verb "be" instead of its past participle form, "been". While a few examples of the incorrect phrase can be found, primarily in scientific and news contexts, it's crucial to avoid this error in formal writing. Always use "have been published" or alternative correct phrases like "have been released" to ensure grammatical accuracy and maintain a professional tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been published

Corrects the grammatical error by using the correct past participle form of 'to be'.

has been published

Uses the correct singular form of the auxiliary verb for singular subjects.

have been released

Replaces 'published' with 'released', offering a similar meaning.

have come out

Uses the idiom 'come out' to indicate something has been made available.

have appeared in print

Specifies that the publication is in printed form.

have been made public

Emphasizes the act of making something accessible to the public.

have been circulated

Suggests wider distribution of the information.

have seen the light of day

Uses a metaphorical expression for being published or released.

have been disseminated

Implies a formal and widespread distribution of information.

have been issued

Indicates that something has been formally produced or distributed.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "have be published"?

The correct phrasing is "have been published". The auxiliary verb "have" requires the past participle form of "be", which is "been".

Can I use "have be published" in any context?

No, "have be published" is grammatically incorrect and should not be used in formal writing or speech. Use "have been published" instead.

What are some alternatives to saying "have been published"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "have been released", "have come out", or "have been made public".

What's the difference between "have be published" and "have been published"?

"Have be published" is grammatically incorrect. "Have been published" is the correct form and indicates that something has already been made available to the public.