has traces of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has traces of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something contains remnants or evidence of another substance, quality, or characteristic. Example: "The ancient pottery has traces of a unique glaze that suggests it was made by a skilled artisan."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"Hugo has traces of narcissism".

The New Yorker

To begin with, Atkinson, too, has traces of twitch.

The Guardian

Because it contains tobacco, snus has traces of nitrosamines, a cancer-causing agent found in tobacco.

The New York Times

The face-saver has traces of fragrant orange, peppermint and apricot ($29.50 for 1.7 ounces; www.origins.com).

The New York Times - Style

The word "gallery," which he uses a lot, has traces of Elmer Fudd and Colonel Klink.

The New Yorker

I am excited to see that she also has traces of the male-like facial plumage.

The New York Times

"Brazil still has traces of primitive societies that rely on all of their senses.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

Her mouth had traces of dried saliva.

The New Yorker

Some have traces of painted decoration.

Britannica

No ingredients originating in Ireland had traces of horse.

The Guardian

Both skulls also had traces of the beaks.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has traces of", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being detected and what it is a trace of. This avoids ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the relationship.

Common error

Avoid using "has traces of" to imply a significant quantity or impact when only minimal amounts are present. This can lead to misinterpretations about the true extent or effect of the trace element.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has traces of" functions as a verb phrase indicating the presence of a small quantity or indication of something. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and widely used. Examples demonstrate its application in various contexts, from scientific analyses to describing intangible qualities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has traces of" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to indicate the presence of a small amount or indication of something. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and common usage across diverse contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedias. While generally neutral in tone, it can lean towards formal or scientific depending on the context. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and avoid overstating the significance of the trace elements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contains remnants of

Focuses on the remaining parts or elements of something.

exhibits signs of

Highlights the indicators or evidence of something.

shows evidence of

Emphasizes the proof or indication of something's presence.

reveals hints of

Suggests subtle or indirect indications of something.

presents indications of

Similar to 'shows evidence of', but slightly more formal.

displays vestiges of

Indicates remaining signs of something that is disappearing or no longer exists.

betrays a hint of

Suggests an unintentional or subtle revelation of something.

bears the mark of

Implies a lasting impact or influence that is evident.

includes a touch of

Highlights a slight or subtle inclusion of something.

possesses a shadow of

Indicates a faint or weakened presence of something.

FAQs

How can I use "has traces of" in a sentence?

Use "has traces of" to indicate the presence of a small amount or indication of something. For example, "The water sample "has traces of" lead".

What can I say instead of "has traces of"?

You can use alternatives like "contains remnants of", "shows evidence of", or "exhibits signs of" depending on the context.

Is it accurate to use "has traces of" when referring to intangible qualities?

Yes, "has traces of" can be used for both physical substances and intangible qualities. For example, "His work "has traces of" humor".

What's the difference between "has traces of" and "is full of"?

"Has traces of" indicates a small amount or indication, while "is full of" implies a large quantity or significant presence. The former suggests minimal presence, while the latter suggests abundance.