has to fund

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has to fund" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating a necessity or obligation to provide financial support for something. Example: "The organization has to fund the new community project to ensure its success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

30 human-written examples

And so he has to fund his great work with a begging bowl.

Independent

It would be very unfair for C.A.P. to say LIPA has to fund it or else.

The New York Times

Obviously, there's no such thing as 100% independent research: someone, somewhere has to fund it.

The Guardian

Someone has to fund a production line for the integrated circuit computers that T.I. can't see a use for.

The New Yorker

Only 25% come from Scotland and the EU jointly, because the university has to fund their tuition.

The Guardian

"The vendor has to fund this out of their own cashflow," says Karl Deeter of Irish Mortgage Brokers.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

30 human-written examples

You have to fund this".

The New York Times

You have to fund them from elsewhere.

The Guardian

Hang about.. Women have to fund women's services?

Independent

They have to fund their movies on Kickstarter.

The New Yorker

He knew you had to fund those troops!

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has to fund", ensure that the context clearly indicates who or what is responsible for providing the financial support and what is being funded. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "has to fund" without clearly defining the extent or limits of the financial obligation. Unclear parameters can lead to disputes or misinterpretations about the level of support required.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has to fund" functions as a verb phrase expressing obligation or necessity. It indicates that someone or something is required to provide financial resources for a specific purpose, as shown by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has to fund" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a financial obligation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across various contexts, particularly in news and business. When using this phrase, clarity is crucial: ensure the responsible party and the purpose of the funding are well-defined. For variations, consider alternatives like "must finance" or "is required to fund", adjusting based on the context and desired formality. Remember, while seemingly straightforward, providing full context avoids any potential ambiguities in interpretation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must finance

Expresses a strong obligation to provide funding, similar to "has to fund" but with a more formal tone.

is required to fund

Highlights a requirement or regulation necessitating the provision of funds.

needs to finance

Indicates a necessity for financial support, similar in tone and strength to "has to fund".

is obliged to fund

Emphasizes a formal or legal obligation to provide funding.

is compelled to fund

Suggests a strong external pressure or force making funding necessary.

should finance

Indicates a recommendation or advisability of providing funding.

is expected to fund

Highlights an anticipation or expectation of funding being provided.

is supposed to fund

Suggests a duty or plan that involves providing funding.

is set to fund

Indicates a planned or scheduled allocation of funds.

will need to fund

Highlights the future need for financial support.

FAQs

What does "has to fund" mean?

The phrase "has to fund" means that someone or something is obligated or required to provide financial resources for a particular purpose.

How can I use "has to fund" in a sentence?

You can use "has to fund" to indicate a financial obligation. For example: "The company "has to fund" the project to meet its goals."

What are some alternatives to "has to fund"?

Alternatives include "must finance", "is required to fund", or "needs to finance". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is it better to say "has to fund" or "must fund"?

"Has to fund" and "must fund" are largely interchangeable. "Must fund" carries a slightly stronger sense of obligation but both are grammatically correct. The choice depends on the desired emphasis.