has the order to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has the order to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone has been given a directive or command to perform a specific action. Example: "The officer has the order to secure the perimeter and ensure everyone's safety."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Only once has the order to shoot to kill been issued, during the Torp hostage crisis in 1994.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The latter had the order to perpetrate mass murders in Moscow.

Yale University

4.10pm: Team Sky have the order to get close to the leaders with two laps to go.

The Guardian - Sport

The Spanish government has given the order to seal all polling stations.

Huffington Post

He testified that he had issued the order to shoot.

The New York Times

Lawyers for the city have said the order to demolish the building was justified.

The New York Times

The Federal Environmental Protection Agency had issued the order to the Wagner Brothers Seed Corporation of Farmingdale last year.

The New York Times

The building manager had given the order to evacuate shortly after 2 P.M.

The New York Times

The ACLU is pushing to have the order extended.

The Washington Post

Perhaps that would have restored order to the financial sector.

The Economist

They had an order to the chants.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has the order to", ensure the context clearly indicates who is giving the order and who is receiving it for clarity.

Common error

Avoid assuming "has the order to" implies unlimited power. The order should be within the giver's jurisdiction and the receiver's responsibilities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has the order to" functions as a verbal phrase indicating that someone has received a command or directive. Ludwig AI confirms this usage, demonstrating its role in conveying instructions or commands.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has the order to" is a grammatically sound and usable expression to indicate someone has received a directive or command. Ludwig's AI confirms this. It's most commonly found in news and media, wiki and academic contexts, conveying instructions or obligations. While not overly frequent, the phrase is clear and effective for communicating that a directive has been given. Remember to ensure clarity about who issues the order and who receives it for optimal understanding.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is instructed to

Focuses on the instruction being given, rather than the act of ordering.

is directed to

Emphasizes the direction or guidance provided.

is commanded to

Highlights the authoritative nature of the instruction.

is required to

Stresses the obligation to perform the action.

is authorized to

Indicates permission and power to act.

is empowered to

Highlights that someone has the authority to do something.

is given permission to

Implies that someone obtained approval.

is under orders to

Explains the state of obeying orders.

receives instructions to

Highlights the act of receiving the instruction.

must

Expresses a necessity or requirement, acting as a more concise alternative.

FAQs

How can I use "has the order to" in a sentence?

Use "has the order to" to indicate that someone has received a directive or command to perform a specific action. For instance, "The captain "has the order to" secure the perimeter".

What are some alternatives to "has the order to"?

You can use alternatives like "is instructed to", "is directed to", or "is commanded to", depending on the level of formality and the context of the instruction.

Is it correct to say "had the order to" instead of "has the order to"?

Yes, "had the order to" is correct when referring to a past directive. "Has the order to" indicates a current directive.

What's the difference between "has the order to" and "was ordered to"?

"Has the order to" emphasizes the current state of possessing the order, while "was ordered to" focuses on the action of receiving the order. You can say, "The general "has the order to" deploy troops", meaning the order is active. Alternatively, "The troops "were ordered to" deploy" focuses on the event of the order being given.