has risks

USAGE SUMMARY

'has risks' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you need to express the idea that something involves risks or potential for danger. For example: "Investing in the stock market has risks, but it can also be financially rewarding."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Everything has risks".

The New York Times

But such rigour has risks.

The Economist

"Everything has risks," he said.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mr. Bush's approach has risks.

The New York Times

Like any surgery, it has risks.

The New York Times - Science

The tough talk, however, has risks.

The New York Times - Health

He does not deny that the endeavor has risks.

The New York Times - Science

Challenging Mr. Romney's residency has risks for both sides.

The New York Times

But in politics even playing it safe has risks.

The New York Times

Yet the concede-your-flaws strategy has risks.

The New York Times

But substitute salt – potassium chloride – has risks of its own.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has risks" to introduce a discussion of potential downsides or complications. This sets the stage for a more comprehensive analysis.

Common error

Avoid presenting a situation as entirely positive. Omitting the fact that something "has risks" can lead to unrealistic expectations and mistrust.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has risks" functions primarily as a declarative statement to indicate that something involves potential dangers or negative consequences. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is considered correct and usable in written English. The examples provided by Ludwig confirm this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Social Media

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has risks" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to acknowledge potential downsides across a variety of situations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's appropriate for general use. It's particularly prevalent in news and media, and also appears in science and formal business contexts. When using "has risks", ensure you're providing a balanced assessment by acknowledging both potential benefits and drawbacks, preventing any overstatement of positive outcomes. Remember that this expression serves to inform and caution, setting the stage for a more comprehensive analysis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

involves dangers

Replaces "risks" with "dangers", emphasizing the potential for harm.

entails hazards

Uses more formal vocabulary, substituting "risks" with "hazards" and "has" with "entails".

poses threats

Highlights the threatening nature of the risks.

carries potential drawbacks

Focuses on the negative aspects or disadvantages associated with something.

comes with perils

Emphasizes the dangerous aspects of a situation or action.

is fraught with uncertainty

Shifts the focus to the uncertain nature of the outcomes.

presents possible complications

Highlights the potential for difficulties or problems to arise.

bears inherent uncertainties

Stresses that the uncertainties are a natural part of the situation.

is not without its downsides

Acknowledges that there are negative aspects to consider.

harbors latent vulnerabilities

Emphasizes hidden or not immediately obvious weaknesses that could lead to problems.

FAQs

How can I use "has risks" in a sentence?

You can use "has risks" to indicate that a particular action, decision, or situation involves potential dangers or negative consequences. For example, "Investing in new technology "has risks", but it can also lead to significant improvements in efficiency".

What are some alternatives to "has risks"?

Some alternatives include phrases like "involves dangers", "entails hazards", or "carries potential drawbacks". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Which is correct: "has risks" or "have risks"?

"Has risks" is grammatically correct when referring to a singular subject. For example, "This strategy "has risks"." "Have risks" would be used with a plural subject, such as "These strategies "have risks"".

What's the difference between "has risks" and "carries risks"?

While both phrases convey a similar meaning, "has risks" is a more general expression, while "carries risks" can imply a more inherent or intrinsic association of the risks with the subject. For instance, "This investment "has risks"" vs. "This type of investment "carries risks"".