Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

has recognized

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"has recognized" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in the present perfect tense, which indicates an action that began in the past and is still relevant or ongoing in the present. Example: The organization has recognized the efforts of its employees by awarding them bonuses and promotions.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

"Barack Obama has recognized that".

News & Media

The New York Times

Not one has recognized me.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sanders himself has recognized this, of course.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Stephon Marbury has recognized Jackson's innate abilities.

Today, the game has recognized the fact.

News & Media

The New Yorker

France has recognized the opposition coalition.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

"Would Tom have recognized himself?

European states have recognized this.

News & Media

The New York Times

At OfficeMax, a customer had recognized him.

News & Media

The New York Times

You wouldn't have recognized him, Ann.

News & Media

The New Yorker

I wouldn't have recognized his face.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has recognized" when you want to emphasize that an entity has acknowledged or become aware of something, and that this recognition has implications for the present situation.

Common error

Avoid using "has recognized" when referring to a single, completed event in the past. In such cases, use the simple past tense "recognized" instead.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has recognized" functions as a present perfect transitive verb phrase. It indicates that an action of recognizing something has been completed at some point in the past and has relevance to the present. Ludwig AI confirms this usage, providing numerous examples across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

15%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has recognized" is a versatile and frequently used present perfect verb phrase. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical structure is correct, and its usage spans across various domains, including News & Media, Science, and Academia. This phrase conveys acknowledgement, awareness, or acceptance with implications to the present moment. While generally neutral in tone, its specific formality will depend on the context. Remember to distinguish it from "had recognized", which refers to a recognition prior to another point in the past. When other terms are needed, consider the many possibilities: "has acknowledged", "has identified", and "has understood".

FAQs

How do I use "has recognized" in a sentence?

Use "has recognized" to indicate that someone or something has acknowledged or become aware of a fact, situation, or quality. For example, "The company "has recognized" the need for change."

What are some alternatives to "has recognized"?

You can use phrases like "has acknowledged", "has identified", or "has understood" as alternatives to "has recognized", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "had recognized" instead of "has recognized"?

While both are grammatically correct, they convey different meanings. "Has recognized" (present perfect) implies the recognition is relevant now, whereas "had recognized" (past perfect) refers to a recognition that occurred before another past event.

What's the difference between "has recognized" and "recognized"?

"Has recognized" indicates a present perfect tense, emphasizing the ongoing relevance of a past recognition. "Recognized", in the simple past tense, simply states that the recognition occurred at some point in the past without necessarily implying current relevance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: