has opposed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has opposed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something has been in disagreement or has resisted a particular idea, action, or policy in the past and continues to do so. Example: "The organization has opposed the new regulations since they were first proposed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Bratton has opposed such efforts.

The New Yorker

Who has opposed it?

The New York Times

Which doesn't mean he has opposed.

The New York Times

He has opposed shutting down Bethune.

The New York Times

The opposition has opposed the referendum.

The New York Times

Boeing has opposed the motion.

The Washington Post

Mr. McCain has opposed it.

The New York Times

So far, Ms. Martinez has opposed the idea.

The New York Times

Turnbull has opposed the changes in Cabinet.

The Guardian

The administration has opposed such interventions.

The New York Times

The Obama administration has opposed those changes.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has opposed", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being opposed and the reasons behind the opposition.

Common error

Avoid using "has opposed" when a weaker term like "has questioned" or "has considered" would be more accurate. "Has opposed" implies a firm and definitive stance, so ensure the context warrants such strong language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has opposed" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It describes an action of disagreement or resistance that began in the past and has relevance to the present. Ludwig AI indicates its common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has opposed" is a versatile and frequently used verb phrase expressing disagreement or resistance. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical correctness and common usage make it a reliable choice in various contexts, particularly in news and formal communications. Alternatives such as "has resisted" or "has objected to" can offer subtle variations in meaning. When using "has opposed", ensure the context warrants the strength of the phrase and that the object of opposition is clear. By understanding its nuances and appropriate usage, writers can effectively convey their intended meaning and avoid common errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has resisted

This alternative implies a stronger, more active form of opposition.

has objected to

This phrase suggests a formal expression of disapproval.

has disagreed with

This indicates a difference of opinion or a lack of consensus.

has been against

This alternative suggests a general stance of disapproval or negativity.

has disapproved of

This implies a negative judgment or moral objection.

has fought against

This suggests active and sustained efforts to prevent something.

has challenged

This alternative indicates a questioning of the validity or appropriateness of something.

has taken a stand against

This implies a public and firm declaration of opposition.

has been in disagreement with

This phrase emphasizes the lack of alignment or consensus.

has not supported

This indicates a lack of endorsement or assistance.

FAQs

How can I use "has opposed" in a sentence?

You can use "has opposed" to describe someone or something that has resisted or disagreed with a particular idea, action, or policy. For example, "The senator "has opposed" the new bill due to concerns about its potential impact on small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "has opposed"?

Some alternatives to "has opposed" include "has resisted", "has objected to", or "has disagreed with". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "has opposed" and "is opposed to"?

"Has opposed" indicates a past action of opposing something, while "is opposed to" describes a current state of opposition. "He "has opposed" the policy in the past" implies previous resistance. "He is opposed to the policy" indicates a current disagreement.

When is it inappropriate to use "has opposed"?

It may be inappropriate to use "has opposed" when the level of disagreement is mild or uncertain. If someone has merely questioned or expressed reservations, a stronger term like ""has opposed"" might be an overstatement. Consider alternatives like "has expressed concern about".