has not spent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not spent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone has not used or allocated a certain amount of time, money, or resources up to the present moment. Example: "She has not spent any money on unnecessary items this month."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Regardless, he has not spent much.

The New York Times - Sports

Apparently Congress has not spent enough money".

The New York Times

He has not spent years on terrorism.

The New York Times - Books

The American Future Fund has not spent quite as much.

The New York Times

But he has not spent one day in freedom since.

The Guardian - Opinion

Wenger, at least, has not spent much money.

The Guardian - Sport

He has not spent any money on marketing.

The New York Times

Rodriguez has not spent his long wait alone.

The New York Times - Sports

He has not spent nearly as much time there.

The New Yorker

Since then he has not spent a single week without conducting.

The New York Times - Arts

PALO ALTO — Mark Zuckerberg, America's youngest billionaire at 26, has not spent much money on himself.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not spent", ensure the tense is consistent with the context. It's used to describe an action that started in the past and continues to the present, or has relevance to the present situation.

Common error

Avoid using "has not spent" when referring to a completely finished event in the past. In such cases, use "did not spend" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not spent" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a present perfect negative construction. It indicates the absence of a completed action of spending up to the present moment. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in describing unutilized resources, time, or money.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not spent" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase to indicate the non-completion of spending up to the present. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and offers numerous examples across various reliable sources. The phrase is versatile, fitting neutral and formal registers, and is commonly found in news and business contexts. Remember to choose "did not spend" for past completed actions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

didn't spend

Implies a completed action of not spending in the past, versus a state extending to the present.

did not use

Focuses on the lack of utilization rather than monetary expenditure.

hasn't allocated

Highlights a lack of resource assignment, which could include funds or time.

has not used up

Indicates that a resource remains available because it hasn't been consumed.

has refrained from spending

Emphasizes a deliberate decision not to spend.

has kept unspent

Suggests that something was deliberately saved and not used.

has not disbursed

Refers specifically to not distributing funds, often in a formal context.

has passed up on spending

Indicates an opportunity to spend was declined.

has left untouched

Highlights that something remained in its original state, unspent or unused.

never spent

Conveys that an action or event has not happened at any time in the past until now, with a higher degree of emphasis.

FAQs

How do I use "has not spent" in a sentence?

Use "has not spent" to describe an action of not spending that started in the past and continues to the present or has a present relevance. For instance, "The company "has not spent" its marketing budget yet."

What's the difference between "has not spent" and "did not spend"?

"Has not spent" implies the action extends to the present or has a present consequence, while "did not spend" refers to a completed action in the past. For example, "He "has not spent" his inheritance" suggests some of it remains, whereas "He "did not spend" his inheritance on a car" simply states a past action.

What are some alternatives to "has not spent"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "didn't spend", "hasn't allocated", or "did not use" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "have not spent" instead of "has not spent"?

Yes, "have not spent" is correct, but it's used with plural subjects (e.g., "They have not spent their savings"). "Has not spent" is for singular subjects (e.g., "He has not spent his bonus").