has not received

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'has not received' is correct and usable in written English.
Example sentence: The package has not received any updates since it was shipped last week.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The league has not received an answer.

The New York Times - Sports

The caller has not received his HEAP.

The New York Times

He has not received any such requests.

The New York Times - Sports

She has not received it.

The New York Times

Bonds, 43, has not received an offer.

The New York Times - Sports

"Richard Glossip has not received this".

The Guardian

He has not received an answer.

The New York Times

He has not received a reply.

The New York Times

He has not received an apology.

The Guardian

He has not received his prize.

The Guardian - Tech

Their group still has not received an official response.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not received", ensure the subject and object are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify who or what has not received what.

Common error

Avoid using "has not receive" as it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "has not received", using the past participle of 'receive'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not received" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a present perfect negative construction. It indicates that an action (receiving) has not been completed up to the present moment. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not received" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed verb phrase that indicates the lack of obtaining something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in various writing contexts. Its neutrality makes it suitable for news, scientific writing, and general communication. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity in defining the subject and object. Remember to use "received", not "receive", to maintain correct tense. Ludwig examples illustrate the phrase's wide range of applicability across different domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has not obtained

This alternative uses a more formal verb.

failed to receive

This alternative highlights a failure in the process of receiving.

did not acquire

This alternative implies a more active effort to gain something.

did not get

This alternative is more informal and direct.

was not given

This alternative emphasizes the act of giving from another party.

never got

This is a more colloquial way to express a lack of receipt.

has been denied

This alternative suggests a refusal to grant something.

remains without

This alternative emphasizes the continuing lack of something.

is still awaiting

This alternative suggests anticipation and a future expectation.

is lacking in

This alternative focuses on a deficiency or absence.

FAQs

How to use "has not received" in a sentence?

Use "has not received" to indicate that someone or something didn't obtain or get something. For example: "The letter "has not received" a response yet."

What can I say instead of "has not received"?

You can use alternatives like "did not get", "failed to receive", or "did not obtain" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has not received" or "has not receive"?

"Has not received" is the correct form. "Has not receive" is grammatically incorrect because it doesn't use the past participle of the verb 'receive'.

What's the difference between "has not received" and "was not given"?

"Has not received" implies a general lack of receipt, while "was not given" specifically indicates that someone else did not provide something. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the lack of obtaining versus the act of not being given something.