has not intervened

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not intervened" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something has not taken action or stepped in during a situation or event. Example: "Despite the ongoing conflict, the government has not intervened to mediate between the parties involved."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

But the E.P.A. has not intervened.

The New York Times

President Obama has not intervened in the case.

The New York Times

The Department of Health and Human Services has not intervened.

The Washington Post

Japan has not intervened in currency markets in some time.

The New York Times

The government has not intervened in her case.

The New York Times

(The United States has provided non-lethal aid to the rebels, but has not intervened militarily).

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

"Definitely Egypt hasn't intervened so far and they have no intention of doing so".

The Guardian

And the government hasn't intervened to get a handle on the situation.

Vice

The government hasn't intervened against Target for its involvement in the Minnesota gubernatorial race.

Huffington Post

Many wonder why Italy's culture officials have not intervened.

The New York Times

N.B.A. officials generally have not intervened in these situations.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has not intervened" when you want to emphasize the absence of active participation or interference in a specific situation. This phrasing often implies a deliberate choice or policy of non-involvement.

Common error

Avoid using "has not intervened" when the subject was never expected to intervene in the first place. Ensure there's a reasonable expectation of action before using this phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not intervened" functions as a verb phrase indicating a lack of action or interference by a specified entity. Ludwig examples confirm its use in describing situations where intervention was possible or expected but did not occur. Ludwig AI analysis considers the phrase grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Science

8%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has not intervened" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe the absence of action or interference in a given situation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide applicability. It appears most often in news and media contexts, with a neutral tone suitable for both formal and informal communication. Understanding the nuances of this phrase helps ensure accurate and effective communication when describing situations where intervention was absent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not step in

Focuses on the physical act of entering a situation to influence it, rather than a more general sense of intervention.

took no action

Emphasizes the absence of any kind of action taken, highlighting a passive role.

remained uninvolved

Highlights the state of being separate and not participating in the situation.

stayed out of it

An informal way to express non-participation, suggesting a deliberate choice to avoid involvement.

did not interfere

Implies a conscious decision to avoid disrupting or meddling in the situation.

refrained from acting

Emphasizes the conscious effort to abstain from taking any action.

left it alone

Suggests a hands-off approach, allowing the situation to proceed without assistance.

declined to get involved

Focuses on the refusal to participate or become entangled in the situation.

did nothing to prevent

Highlights the failure to take steps to stop something from happening.

stood idly by

Suggests a passive observation of the situation without offering help or intervention.

FAQs

How can I use "has not intervened" in a sentence?

You can use "has not intervened" to indicate a lack of action or involvement in a situation. For example: "Despite the ongoing conflict, the government "has not intervened" to mediate between the parties involved."

What are some alternatives to "has not intervened"?

You can use alternatives such as "did not step in", "took no action", or "remained uninvolved" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "did not intervene" or "has not intervened"?

Both "did not intervene" and ""has not intervened"" are grammatically correct. "Did not intervene" refers to a specific past event, while ""has not intervened"" suggests a continued lack of action up to the present.

What does it mean when someone "has not intervened"?

When someone ""has not intervened"", it means they have chosen not to take action or become involved in a particular situation, often implying a deliberate decision or policy.