has not heard

USAGE SUMMARY

"has not heard" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that the subject has not yet heard. Example: John has not heard the news about the upcoming election.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Who has not heard such a tale?

The New Yorker

She has not heard from him since.

Independent

Apparently, he has not heard me.

The New Yorker

She has not heard from them since.

The Guardian

She has not heard of the sanctions.

The Guardian

He says he has not heard back.

The New York Times

He has not heard from her since.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

He hasn't heard.

Stanford University

He hasn't heard back.

The New York Times

It hasn't heard of you, either.

The New York Times

He hasn't heard anything yet.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not heard", ensure the context clearly indicates the source or subject from which the information is missing. For example: "She has not heard from her family since the evacuation."

Common error

Avoid using incorrect tenses, like "had not heard" when the present perfect "has not heard" is more appropriate. Ensure subject-verb agreement: "They have not heard" (plural) versus "He has not heard" (singular).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not heard" functions as a verb phrase indicating a state of lacking awareness or knowledge, or not receiving communication up to the present moment. Ludwig AI confirms that this usage is both correct and commonly found in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Formal & Business

12%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Science

7%

Academia

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has not heard" is a grammatically correct and very common verb phrase used to indicate a lack of awareness, knowledge, or communication received up to the present time. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, though it most frequently appears in News & Media. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the source or subject from which the information is missing. Consider alternatives like "is unaware of" or "has no knowledge of" to vary your language while maintaining a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has no knowledge of

Directly states a lack of information.

is unaware of

Focuses on a lack of knowledge about something.

remains uninformed about

Highlights the continued state of not being informed.

has not been told about

Highlights that the information was not shared with the person.

did not receive word of

Emphasizes the lack of communication.

is oblivious to

Suggests a lack of perception or attention.

never learned about

Focuses on the absence of prior education or information.

is ignorant of

Indicates a lack of awareness, potentially with a negative connotation.

is in the dark about

Implies secrecy or intentional withholding of information.

hasn't been privy to

Suggests a lack of access to confidential information.

FAQs

How to use "has not heard" in a sentence?

You can use "has not heard" to indicate that someone is unaware of information or hasn't received communication. For example: "He has not heard the latest news" or "She has not heard back from her application".

What can I say instead of "has not heard"?

You can use alternatives like "is unaware of", "has no knowledge of", or "remains uninformed about" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has not heard" or "had not heard"?

"Has not heard" is present perfect tense, used for actions that started in the past and continue to the present or have a present result. "Had not heard" is past perfect, used for actions completed before another point in the past. The correct choice depends on the context.

What's the difference between "has not heard" and "did not hear"?

"Has not heard" implies a state of not having received information up to the present. "Did not hear" refers to a specific instance in the past when someone didn't hear something. The former has present relevance while the latter is a completed past action.