has no knowledge of

USAGE SUMMARY

"has no knowledge of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express that someone does not know about something. Example: The accountant has no knowledge of the company's financial records.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

She has no knowledge of social or historical context.

The Guardian

The defendant has no knowledge of his son's whereabouts.

The New Yorker

The Bivings Group says it has "no knowledge of them".

The Guardian

A Trinity Mirror spokesman said the company has "no knowledge of ever using Glenn Mulcaire".

The Guardian

He's a nice guy, but he has no knowledge of airplanes.

The New Yorker

She has said she has no knowledge of the missing photographs.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

I had no knowledge of the country.

The New Yorker

"We have no knowledge of this.

The Guardian

I had no knowledge of them.

The New York Times

"I have no knowledge of it".

The New York Times

You have no knowledge of that?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has no knowledge of," ensure the context clearly defines what the subject lacks knowledge about. This provides clarity and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "has no knowledge of" when a weaker expression like "is unfamiliar with" is more appropriate. The former implies a complete absence of knowledge, while the latter suggests a lack of detailed understanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no knowledge of" functions as a declarative expression indicating a lack of awareness or information about a specific subject. It's used to explicitly state that someone is not informed about something. As noted by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

22%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has no knowledge of" is a versatile phrase used to express a lack of awareness or information. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. The phrase is suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, science, and academic writing. While generally neutral in tone, it is important to consider the context to avoid unintended implications of ignorance. Consider alternatives like "is unaware of" or "is uninformed about" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is unaware of

Emphasizes a lack of awareness, which is a state of not knowing something.

has no information about

Directly indicates the absence of specific details or data.

is uninformed about

Stresses the absence of information, suggesting a need for better data.

lacks awareness of

Focuses on the absence of conscious knowledge about something.

is ignorant of

Highlights a lack of information or understanding, potentially implying a lack of effort to learn.

is not cognizant of

A more formal way of expressing a lack of awareness or knowledge.

is oblivious to

Suggests a lack of perception or attention to something, often implying that it should be known.

is unacquainted with

Implies a lack of familiarity or experience with a particular subject or thing.

is in the dark about

Suggests a complete lack of knowledge, often implying secrecy or exclusion.

hasn't a clue about

An informal way of saying that someone has absolutely no idea or understanding.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "has no knowledge of" in formal writing?

In formal contexts, you can replace "has no knowledge of" with alternatives like "is not cognizant of", "lacks awareness of", or "is uninformed about". These options maintain a professional tone while conveying the same meaning.

What's the difference between "is unaware of" and "has no knowledge of"?

While both phrases indicate a lack of awareness, "has no knowledge of" often implies a complete absence of information, whereas "is unaware of" can suggest a more general lack of attention or perception.

Is it always appropriate to use "has no knowledge of"?

While grammatically correct, "has no knowledge of" can sound somewhat formal. In informal settings, consider using alternatives like "doesn't know about" or "hasn't a clue about" for a more relaxed tone.

Can "has no knowledge of" be used to imply ignorance?

While it primarily indicates a lack of information, the phrase can imply ignorance if the context suggests the person should reasonably possess the knowledge. Choose your wording carefully to avoid unintended implications.