has not found

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'has not found' is grammatically correct and is usable in written English.
It can be used when the speaker wants to express that something has not yet been discovered or located. Example: Despite numerous searches, researchers have not found any evidence of the sunken ship.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

So far, he has not found it.

The New York Times - Science

The team has not found a new naming-rights sponsor.

The New York Times - Sports

He still has not found the time to finish.

The Washington Post

To date, The Times has not found evidence of that.

The New York Times

The "post-party" era, however, has not found a replacement.

The Guardian - Opinion

Terrell has not found that to be so.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

It still hasn't found its feet.

The New Yorker

Because he hasn't found it.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"He hasn't found many, has he?" she said.

University of California, Berkeley

"He still hasn't found a job".

The New York Times

She hasn't found St. Agnes easy.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has not found" to clearly indicate that something has not been located or discovered, emphasizing the absence of a finding. Ensure the subject and object of the finding are clear for better understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "has not found" when the context requires a different tense. For example, do not use it if you mean to say something "had not been found" before a specific time.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not found" functions as a verb phrase indicating a lack of discovery or attainment. It is typically used to state that a search or effort has not yielded the expected results, as seen in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

17%

Science

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not found" is a versatile verb phrase used to indicate the absence of discovery or attainment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and appears frequently across various contexts, particularly in News & Media. The phrase is suitable for neutral registers and serves the primary purpose of conveying a negative outcome. When writing, ensure that you use the correct tense and clearly indicate the subject and object of the finding. Alternatives like "did not locate" or "failed to discover" can be used to add nuance, but are not completely interchangeable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not locate

Focuses on the physical act of finding something that was lost or hidden.

failed to discover

Emphasizes the lack of success in uncovering new information or insights.

did not come across

Suggests a chance encounter that didn't happen.

was unable to detect

Highlights the inability to perceive or identify something using senses or instruments.

has yet to identify

Indicates that the process of identification is ongoing but not yet complete.

remains without discovering

Emphasizes the continuous state of lacking discovery.

has not uncovered

Focuses on revealing something previously concealed.

did not reveal

Highlights the failure to make something known.

has not pinpointed

Indicates a lack of precise location or identification.

is still searching for

Emphasizes the active and ongoing effort to find something.

FAQs

How to use "has not found" in a sentence?

Use "has not found" to indicate the absence of a discovery or location. For example, "The team "has not found" any survivors after the earthquake".

What can I say instead of "has not found"?

You can use alternatives like "did not locate", "failed to discover", or "did not come across" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has not found" or "had not found"?

"Has not found" indicates something that has not been found up to the present, while "had not found" refers to something that was not found before a specific point in the past. Choose based on the timeline you are referencing.

What's the difference between "has not found" and "did not find"?

"Has not found" implies a continuous state of not finding something, suggesting the search might still be ongoing. "Did not find" simply states that something was not found at a specific time in the past.