Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

has not evolved

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not evolved" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has remained unchanged or has not developed over time. Example: "Despite the advancements in technology, the basic principles of the theory has not evolved."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Yet the conversation has not evolved.

News & Media

The New York Times

What has not evolved, however, is this.

Oz is strangely proud that his thinking has not evolved.

Djokovic has evolved, and Nadal has not evolved with him.

News & Media

The New York Times

"The khaki line has not evolved that much.

News & Media

The New York Times

Gene editing has not evolved faster towards clinical application because of its difficulty in implementation.

However, the security has not evolved proportionally, which makes these applications vulnerable and objective of attacks.

However, part of the problem is that the clothing has not evolved.

The Topography of Terror has not evolved beyond a temporary exhibit of photographs.

Crucially, Japan has not evolved a robust system of evaluating the quality of care.

News & Media

The Guardian

Unfortunately, the presentation and delivery of the National Weather Service forecasts has not evolved in decades.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has not evolved" to clearly indicate that something has remained in its original state without any significant changes over time. This is useful when emphasizing a lack of progress or adaptation.

Common error

Avoid using "has not evolved" when small adjustments or adaptations have occurred. The phrase implies a complete absence of significant change, so ensure this accurately reflects the situation you are describing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not evolved" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating a state of non-change or lack of development over time. It typically modifies a noun or subject, asserting that it has remained in its original condition. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has not evolved" is a grammatically correct and commonly used verbal phrase to indicate a lack of change or progress over time. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in written English. It is most frequently found in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts, suggesting a formal to neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a complete absence of significant change to avoid misleading your audience. Consider alternative phrases like "remained unchanged" or "not progressed" for nuanced expression.

FAQs

How can I use "has not evolved" in a sentence?

The phrase "has not evolved" can be used to indicate that something has remained unchanged over time. For example: "Despite the advancements in technology, the core curriculum "has not evolved"."

What are some alternatives to "has not evolved"?

You can use alternatives like "remained unchanged", "stayed static", or "not progressed" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "did not evolve" instead of "has not evolved"?

Yes, "did not evolve" is grammatically correct, but it implies a completed action in the past, while "has not evolved" suggests a state that continues to the present. Choose the tense that best fits the context.

What is the difference between "has not evolved" and "failed to evolve"?

"Has not evolved" simply states a lack of change. "Failed to evolve" suggests an attempt or expectation of change that was not met, often implying a negative consequence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: